BASE HEADER

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- K- Multifunctional Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)?

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 31 i 60 o 88

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95008

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

no further comment

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95024

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Tracey Grimes

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

In the 18 months living in Stratford there have been multiple examples of the Birmingham Road flooding following heavy rain etc as the drainage is not sufficient. Allowing for all these extra houses with a suggested drainage plan doesn't fill me with any hope that it will elminate surface water.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95744

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes Western

Asiant : Marrons

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Planning Practice Guidance quotes the NPPF as stating that SuDS should be used in development unless this would be inappropriate for the site. It is considered that this exception should be included in any policy requiring SuDS in the SWLP, as Draft Policy K does not currently allow for the exception, therefore meaning that the current policy is ‘unsound’.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95810

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Shelagh Marshall

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

A good strategy.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95945

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There are a number of recent SuDs installations which have been designed to be off-line and should only start to fill once a maximum flow in the site’s surface water network exceeds a specified threshold. Even in high rainfall periods these SuDs installations have not filled. Apart from the need to check that they have been built correctly consideration should be given to making all SuDs installations on-line.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96340

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this draft Policy.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96552

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There are a number of recent SuDs installations which have been designed to be off-line and should only start to fill once a maximum flow in the site’s surface water network exceeds a threshold. Even in high rainfall periods these SuDs installations have not filled. Apart from the need to check that they have been built correctly consideration should be given to making all SuDs installations on-line.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96906

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Surrounding areas should not be put at increased risk of flooding

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96993

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

SuDS Systems should be on line only. thus ensuring there is no flow above the maximum runoff permitted.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96995

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’). All SuDS, new and existing, should be owned and maintained by Severn Trent in perpetuity. In some developments local to Alcester, SuDS are maintained by residents which we consider to be inappropriate.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97183

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97257

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Planning Practice Guidance quotes the NPPF as stating that SuDS should be used in development unless this would be inappropriate for the site. It is considered that this exception should be included in any policy requiring SuDS in the SWLP, as Draft Policy K does not currently allow for the exception, therefore meaning that the current policy is ‘unsound’.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97392

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Godwin Developments

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Godwin Developments acknowledge that all development should include high quality sustainable drainage systems.

With regards to Land at Aylesbury Road, the Vison Document states that the site would benefit from a site specific surface water drainage strategy which follows the principles of sustainable drainage. This strategy will ensure that all the surface water falling onto the site is managed and controlled, including the use of an attenuation basin, before being discharged to the environment at a controlled rate. As noted previously Severn Trent Water have already confirmed that there is suitable connection point to serve this site.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97788

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

" development should not be permitted where there is an increase in flood risk to the site or surrounding area. SDC Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment April 2021 map p. 47 shows the area surrounding proposed site BW as RED ie. HIGH. Therefore, proposed site BW should not be a preferred location for settlement.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97981

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Fox

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

SUDs are often dangerous areas for small children and should be away from the development. What is not clear is how these work in area of high water table, and there should be clear indication of how the SUDs will then drain and where they will drain to, and how this then affects the flood risk further downstream. It is about protecting all properties in South Warwickshire, not just the houses on the new settlement area. It is clear this policy has not been considered in the site selection ratings.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 98108

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited

Asiant : Marrons

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Planning Practice Guidance quotes the NPPF as stating that SuDS should be used in development unless this would be inappropriate for the site. It is considered that this exception should be included in any policy requiring SuDS in the SWLP, as Draft Policy K does not currently allow for the exception, therefore meaning that the current policy is ‘unsound’.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 98655

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Planning Practice Guidance quotes the NPPF as stating that SuDS should be used in development unless this would be inappropriate for the site. It is considered that this exception should be included in any policy requiring SuDS in the SWLP, as Draft Policy K does not currently allow for the exception, therefore meaning that the current policy is ‘unsound’.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 99566

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Howson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Draft K - Re: Long Marston:

The brook at the back of Long Marston (Nowell Brook), can barely cope, and with farms and fields sometimes not clearing ditches and the local authority seemingly never clearing culverts, any extra water caused by development will not be manageable.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 99649

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

yes

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 100130

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Good policy.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 100370

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

NA

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 100993

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Rowington Landowner Consortium

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy requires all developments incorporate SuDS to manage surface water runoff effectively, aligning with the National Planning Policy Framework 2024, which requires major developments to include sustainable drainage systems unless there is clear evidence that this would be inappropriate.

The site C1 would seek to integrate multifunctional SuDS to manage surface water runoff and utilise these areas to enhance biodiversity, improve water quality, and provide recreational spaces. This approach would ensure that the development contributes positively to the local environment and community, aligning with sustainable development principles.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101116

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mac Mic Group

Asiant : Marrons

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Planning Practice Guidance quotes the NPPF as stating that SuDS should be used in development unless this would be inappropriate for the site. It is considered that this exception should be included in any policy requiring SuDS in the SWLP, as Draft Policy K does not currently allow for the exception, therefore meaning that the current policy is ‘unsound’.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101181

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Hallam Land Management Limited

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Planning Practice Guidance quotes the NPPF as stating that SuDS should be used in development unless this would be inappropriate for the site. It is considered that this exception should be included in any policy requiring SuDS in the SWLP, as Draft Policy K does not currently allow for the exception, therefore meaning that the current policy is ‘unsound’.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101431

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Planning Practice Guidance quotes the NPPF as stating that SuDS should be used in development unless this would be inappropriate for the site. It is considered that this exception should be included in any policy requiring SuDS in the SWLP, as Draft Policy K does not currently allow for the exception, therefore meaning that the current policy is ‘unsound’.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101453

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Hallam Land

Asiant : Marrons

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Planning Practice Guidance quotes the NPPF as stating that SuDS should be used in development unless this would be inappropriate for the site. It is considered that this exception should be included in any policy requiring SuDS in the SWLP, as Draft Policy K does not currently allow for the exception, therefore meaning that the current policy is ‘unsound’.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101562

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Zoe Leventhal

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Essential for net zero challenges to be met and to protect nature

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101686

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Rollason

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This development is not good for the area

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101931

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Agree with reservations

SuDS pools are obviously necessary but should be placed inside the boundary of new development, not outside, therefore using more land. Any new SuDS ponds close to Tachbrook Country Park should not be included in the Country Park land but in the development land.

SuDs pools should also be placed well away from children’s play areas, unlike the developments off Europa Way, including the Sandpit Boulevard development, where the play equipment is located next to the SuDS pools.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102121

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Joseph Dimambro-Denson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

NGL I just wanna see more rain gardens, I think they're pretty.