Yes

ID sylw: 86474

Derbyniwyd: 26/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs vivien bryer

Excellent.

Yes

ID sylw: 86683

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater

SuDS should be an assumed prerequisite for all development.

Yes

ID sylw: 86758

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Linda Dane

In particular all developers should be able to demonstrate that they have tapped into local knowledge.

No

ID sylw: 86931

Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

Maintain existing systems. No more development

Yes

ID sylw: 87079

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

Yes

Yes

ID sylw: 87411

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

ID sylw: 87591

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

I agree

No

ID sylw: 88428

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Maurice Stokes

SUDs are not a viable option for the Bearley/Wilmcote site. The ground is predominantly heavy clay soil overlying Wilmcote stone. Alternative sites would be more suitable for SUDs to beneficial.

Yes

ID sylw: 88735

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree

Other

ID sylw: 89070

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

No SUDS should be approved until future management and maintenance arrangements have been agreed and there is cvlear identification of liability in the event of their failure. Management companies are completely unacceptable

Yes

ID sylw: 89272

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jon Knight

SuDS is a vital part of both climate resilience and reducing the effects on waste water handling and, by implication, pollution on our streams and rivers. Once again though I'd replace quite a few of the "should" with "must" in this draft policy to make it more enforceable, otherwise developers will ignore it.

Yes

ID sylw: 89481

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson

None.

Yes

ID sylw: 89670

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

none

No

ID sylw: 90501

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jayne Jones

I appreciate developers will suggest various measures to manage water e.g. drainage/balancing pools etc. However, this doesn't work, and it would appear it is a strategy by developers when seeking approval for plans.

Separate document attached to earlier item, refers to construction firm returning to site 3 years post construction to distribute sand bags, as the run-off did not direct to balancing pool.

Yes

ID sylw: 90627

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwick Town Council

The SWLP must ensure that new developments are located in areas with the lowest risk of flooding, reducing long-term vulnerability and costs. Encourage the use of multi-functional SuDS that provide biodiversity, water quality, and amenity benefits since it will prevent reliance on traditional underground drainage systems that can contribute to flooding.
Also like to see actions towards preventing flooding in existing developments.

Yes

ID sylw: 91185

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.

Yes

ID sylw: 91339

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council [Flood Risk Management Team]

Proposed redrafted wording for Explanation Paragraph 3 and moving parts of the SuDS policy to the Flood Risk policy.

Yes

ID sylw: 91683

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Yes

ID sylw: 91687

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Yes

ID sylw: 91778

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Taylor

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 92473

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Agree

No

ID sylw: 92603

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: The Planning Bureau Ltd

In order for the future plan to be found sound the following should be implemented:

• Any future policy should be stepped in line with emerging government targets and requirements and
• Ensure the policy is properly assessed within the forthcoming viability assessment

Yes

ID sylw: 93176

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gordon Sharp

Developing green field sites only increases flow risks with the risk of overburdening primary drainage systems

Yes

ID sylw: 93259

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Coulsting

I agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-H- Water Efficiency

Yes

ID sylw: 93697

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong

Yes, I agree.

Yes

ID sylw: 93882

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Beverley Comley

Suds must receive regular maintenance and be funded accordingly

No

ID sylw: 93904

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Patrick Embleton

In the new build area the SuDS has not been entirely successful so thinking it is the answer is foolhardy

Yes

ID sylw: 93912

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Beverley Comley

Maintenance must be budgeted for

No

ID sylw: 93949

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carina Taylor

I don't think the plans for reducing flooding are robust enough, no houses should be built on flood land, the roads at the moment cannot cope with deluges of rain, these need addressing first.

Other

ID sylw: 94141

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stuart Mace

The provision of SuDS creates implicit future maintenance costs and responsibilities to ensure their ongoing reliability and function. Developments that incorporate such systems require careful planning and commitment over the long term. This includes regular testing of effectiveness, flushing and cleaning. Existing council services are already constrained and roads are not jetted regularly - the added pressure of SuDS would only place yet more pressure on local service provision.