Yes

ID sylw: 94140

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Kelly

est and most versatile agricultural land should be safeguarded for future food production needs
and is essential to ensure long-term agricultural sustainability.

Yes

ID sylw: 94170

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Samantha Stafford Scott

The best and most versatile agricultural land should be protected from development. It is necessary now and will become even more so in the future.

Yes

ID sylw: 94319

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms M Walker

`

Yes

ID sylw: 94370

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Blandamer

It is important that the best and most versatile agricultural land should be safeguarded for future food production and is essential to ensure long-term agricultural sustainability.

No

ID sylw: 94665

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Renny Wodynska

There should be more concentration on future food supply in the plan, given future flooding/drought risks and
adaptation needs. P

Yes

ID sylw: 94971

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

Yes - the best and most versatile agricultural land should be protected and safe guarded for future food production needs and is esesential to long term sustainability. More so in an uncertain world of possible wars where food production is of paramount importance.

Yes

ID sylw: 95101

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Tracey Grimes

With farming currently under pressure from government policy and less and less farms in the UK, we need at all cost to protect our agricultural land.

Yes

ID sylw: 95313

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

No further comment

Yes

ID sylw: 95393

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Lee Tallen

Yes the 'best and most versatile land' should be protected although such has, for some reason, been included in your preferred sites within clopton quarter?

Yes

ID sylw: 95492

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barrie Goodman

The best and most versatile agricultural land should always be safeguarded to ensure we as a country can grow our own crops. It is essential for our long term agricultural sustainability

Yes

ID sylw: 95671

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Davis

Agricultural land should be protected as it is essential for future food production and long term agricultural sustainability.

No

ID sylw: 95694

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jon Redhead

I think that the results from this can be misleading, and any farmland sold to 'non-Farming' folk, who do not have the interests of the wider community above their own monetary gain, cannot truly justify or prove that land purchased, which was once fully farmed, would not again be suitable for anything but residential development.

No

ID sylw: 95789

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes Western

Asiant : Marrons

The principle of Draft Chapter 11 is supported, although the current draft policy directions are at this moment vague, and specific issues are raised with Draft Policy Directions as set out above.

Other

ID sylw: 95859

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Shelagh Marshall

Policy 49 is flawed in relation to poor quality agricultural land as this can be used by unscrupulous developers of large scale solar pv to support otherwise marginal or unacceptable applications. The difference between Grade 3a and 3b for instance can be very small and dependant upon where samples of soil are collected. The applicants representations on this matter should be confirmed independently at the applicants expense. Badly managed farm land can become 3b simply by being over worked rather than intrinsically poor.
Solar pv developments are big money earners for investors driven by profit rather than zero carbon.

Yes

ID sylw: 95869

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr UDAYA EEDUPUGANTI

Agriclutrual lands should be safeguarded for future food production needs and is essential for long term Agriclutrual sustainability

Other

ID sylw: 95903

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Carter

The value of Grade 3b agricultural land should be fully considered in planning decisions so as much as possible of currently productive Grade 3b land is retained for food production.’

Other

ID sylw: 95981

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes. Will there be a review of agricultural land quality? If so it needs to take into account historic use as well as current use.

No

ID sylw: 96134

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Judith Palmer

I do not believe this will be actioned - I believe developer money will shout loudest and good agricultural land, currently farmed, will be lost (e.g. B1 - Hatton)

Yes

ID sylw: 96376

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

ID sylw: 96499

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

If there is a review of agricultural land quality, it needs to take into account historic use as well as current.

No

ID sylw: 96584

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Ledger

Farmland should not be lost for providing renewable energy. The policy should include provision of solar panels as standard on houses and industrial buildings. Using farmland is detrimental to the environment, though leaching of chemicals.

Other

ID sylw: 96680

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Janet Gee

Agree in principle but poorer quality agricultural land can still be productive - depending on the crop. Local sensitivity is required.

No

ID sylw: 96857

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Grade 3b land is defined as moderate quality, not poor. Land put forward for BW has been planted for many years with valuable crops including wheat, barley, beans and oil seed rape all of which contribute to the national food requirement and economy.

No

ID sylw: 97126

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

This approach is strongly not agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’). The best and most versatile agricultural land is a valuable asset and cannot be replaced. It should not be developed.

Yes

ID sylw: 97186

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

Where retention of agricultural land can rebalance the harm to landscape caused by prior housing development then this should justify the retention and enhancement of these sites as landscape, green space, open space or space for nature, biodiversity or food production.

Yes

ID sylw: 97218

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Emily Morris

The best and most versatile agricultural land should be Safeguarded for future good production needs and is essential for long term sustainability

Yes

ID sylw: 97240

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

No

ID sylw: 97393

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Carl Holloway

Ideally we should not be building on any agricultural land, in the interests of national food security. We should exhaust all brownfield land first, then exhaust the worst quality agricultural land (grade 5), and only then consider grade 4, and so on.

Yes

ID sylw: 97642

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Winter

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 97768

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

Green Belt land put forward for development between Bearley and Wilmcote (BW) has been planted year after year with valuable crops including wheat, barley, beans, and oil seed rape all of which contribute to the national food requirement and economy. Land put forward at other sites eg. E1 is not in the Green Belt and is therefore more suitable for development.