Yes

ID sylw: 91598

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson

How will this be monitored and enforced?

Yes

ID sylw: 91726

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

No

ID sylw: 91799

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Taylor

"We will explore the possibility of requiring long-term management and maintenance (minimum of five years) of new landscape proposals to ensure their establishment. " - should this not be for the lifetime of the development?

Other

ID sylw: 91829

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tim Burridge

Development should not be allowed in the area, and the caveats should be removed (such as that ‘unless there would be an over-riding benefit, for instance to meet an evidenced local housing need’). The Local Plan should be allocating suitable land for housing need.

Yes

ID sylw: 91867

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Hanno Kirner

Where existing special landscapes are negatively affected we should not be developing

Yes

ID sylw: 91929

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Donna Goodwin

Areas where you can’t mitigate the effect of development on the landscape should be protected from development.

Yes

ID sylw: 92271

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Isobel McLauchlin

Where it is impossible to mitigate the effects of building and development on the landscape - this landscape should then be protected from development.

Yes

ID sylw: 92356

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Daphne Tilley

The Ancient Arden landscape must be preserved. Part of it is included in site B1. Therefore this proposed site should not be considered.

Yes

ID sylw: 92444

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Christine Slaughter

Where you can't mitigate the effects of development of the landscape, it should be protected.

Yes

ID sylw: 92522

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Agree

Yes

ID sylw: 92659

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson

No comment

Other

ID sylw: 92733

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Luke Kempton

Development should not be allowed in the area, and the caveats should be removed (such as that ‘unless there would be an over-riding benefit, for instance to meet an evidenced local housing need’). The Local Plan should be allocating suitable land for housing need.

Yes

ID sylw: 93027

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Dominic Momcilovic

Areas where you can't mitigate the effects of development on the landscape should be protected from development.

Yes

ID sylw: 93049

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Blake

Who is the judge of this? A lot of new housing looks very out of keeping

Yes

ID sylw: 93218

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Martina Hunt

Areas where you cannot mitigate the effect of development on the landscape should be protected from development.

No

ID sylw: 93232

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Kim Salmon

Development should not be allowed in the area, and the caveats should be removed (such as that ‘unless there would be an over-riding benefit, for instance to meet an evidenced local housing need’). The Local Plan should be allocating suitable land for housing need.

Other

ID sylw: 93356

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr geoff marston

Caveats such as that ‘unless there would be an over-riding benefit, for instance to meet an evidenced local housing need’ should be removed . The Local Plan should be allocating suitable land for housing need and so development should not be allowed in the area.

Yes

ID sylw: 93409

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Haggarty

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 93564

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

It is a great pity that this document does not follow the policy above. the potential developments of SG15, Sg16, X1 and SG09 would destroy the landscape and character of the Parish of Wellesbourne and Walton. They would create a vast urban sprawl at odds with the village nature we currently have, surrounded by open countryside. The proposed sites for development are all about the rapacious nature of developers and nothing about the character and landscape of our settlement.

Yes

ID sylw: 93626

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr JAMES STEWART

I agree with this policy because areas where development would cause irreversible harm to the landscape should be protected. Some landscapes are too valuable to be altered, and their natural beauty, biodiversity, and ecological functions cannot be effectively mitigated. Protecting these areas ensures they remain intact for future generations, preserving their environmental and cultural significance. Sustainable development should prioritize locations where impacts can be managed, rather than damaging landscapes that cannot be restored.

Yes

ID sylw: 93691

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Claire STEWART

I support this policy because areas where development would cause irreversible harm to the landscape must be safeguarded. Some landscapes are too valuable to be altered, with their natural beauty, biodiversity, and ecological importance impossible to fully mitigate. Protecting these spaces ensures they remain intact for future generations, preserving both their environmental and cultural significance. Sustainable development should focus on locations where impacts can be effectively managed, rather than compromising landscapes that cannot be restored.

Yes

ID sylw: 93783

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr George Power

Areas that cannot have the damaging effects of development alleviated must be protected from development.

Yes

ID sylw: 93821

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr William Campbell

Strongly agree

Yes

ID sylw: 93987

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sue Scurrah

-

Yes

ID sylw: 94139

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Kelly

Areas where you can’t mitigate the effect of development on the
landscape should be protected from development.

Other

ID sylw: 94169

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Samantha Stafford Scott

Development should not be permitted at all if mitigation of damage to the environment cannot be guaranteed.

Yes

ID sylw: 94172

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Holly Whittaker

Areas where you cannot mitigate the effect of development on the landscape should be protected from development.

Yes

ID sylw: 94371

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Blandamer

Areas where you can't mitigate the effect of development on the landscape should be protected from development.

Yes

ID sylw: 94967

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

Yes - areas where you cant mitigate the affect of devlopment on the landscpae should be proteced.

Yes

ID sylw: 95099

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Tracey Grimes

If we can't offset all the issues and environmental concerns that comes with a development then that development must be rejected.