Yes

ID sylw: 93351

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr geoff marston

Yes, but again only in principle.
The National Landscape Area is important. However it is essential to provide more clarity and specific details on how the buffer will work in practice. There should also be clear contracting and sufficient powers to refuse future applications that impact this important landscape area. There should also be clear accountability and meaningful actions if there are breaches.

Yes

ID sylw: 93406

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Haggarty

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 93819

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr William Campbell

Strongly agree

Yes

ID sylw: 95285

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Emma Restall Orr

The National Landscape Area is important, although it is essential to provide more details on how the buffer will work in practice. There must be sufficient powers to refuse future applications that impact this important landscape area. Otherwise it will slowly be eroded and lose any real value.

Yes

ID sylw: 95301

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

no further comment

Yes

ID sylw: 95479

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sue Cuff

in principle. The National Landscape Area is important, although it is essential to provide more details on how the buffer will work in practice, and that there are sufficient powers to refuse future applications that impact this important landscape area.

Other

ID sylw: 95540

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Freeman

Yes, in principle. The National Landscape Area is important, although it is essential to provide
more details on how the buer will work in practice, and that there are sucient powers to
refuse future applications that impact this important landscape area.

Yes

ID sylw: 95788

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes Western

Asiant : Marrons

The importance of protecting the Cotswold National Landscape is recognised, however clarity and robust justification on the proposed extent of any necessary ‘buffer zones’ is required.

Other

ID sylw: 95978

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes. Should the depth of the buffer zone be prescribed? There is no mention of the "Dunsmore and Feldon" Special Landscape Area 97 which abuts the Cotswold National Landscape area. The "Dunsmore and Feldon" Special landscape Area needs protection as well.

Yes

ID sylw: 96137

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rosemary Collier

Yes, in principle. The National Landscape Area is important, although it is essential to provide more details on how the buffer will work in practice, and that there are sufficient powers to refuse future applications that impact this important landscape area.

Yes

ID sylw: 96373

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

ID sylw: 96502

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

The depth of the buffer zone needs to reviewed after a period to assess its effectiveness.

Yes

ID sylw: 97111

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

This approach is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

ID sylw: 97170

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

Extending the Buffer Zone to 5km or at least identifying this as an area of restraint as identified in Policy Direction 45 would further protect and allow the potential for enhancement of the national landscape. The Policy should also encourage the creation of more public rights of way to increase the public access to the enjoyment of the landscape so protected.

Yes

ID sylw: 97234

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

Yes

ID sylw: 97284

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

The importance of protecting the Cotswold National Landscape is recognised, however clarity and justification on the proposed extent of ‘buffer zones’ is required.

Other

ID sylw: 97831

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr HUGH KEEP

Yes but I believe the purpose should be to conserve and enhance the natural beauty AND BIODIVERSITY of the area.

Yes

ID sylw: 97966

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Brenda Stewart

The character of the Cotswolds should be protected by having this buffer zone

Yes

ID sylw: 98020

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Helen Little

Y

Yes

ID sylw: 98031

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barnabas Harrison

Agree

Yes

ID sylw: 98137

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited

Asiant : Marrons

The importance of protecting the Cotswold National Landscape is recognised. The Interactive Map illustrates a 3km buffer, although this is not referenced in the Preferred Options document. Clarity and justification on the extent of buffer zone will be important to ensure the Policy is justified in line with NPPF Paragraph 36 b). Any Policy wording should ensure flexibility within the buffer zones to ensure they are not overly restrictive to development proposals which would otherwise have a limited impact on the National Landscape. This will allow the Policy to be considered positively prepared in line with NPPF Paragraph 36 a).

Yes

ID sylw: 98628

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

The importance of protecting the Cotswold National Landscape is recognised, however clarity and justification on the proposed extent of ‘buffer zones’ is required.

Yes

ID sylw: 98696

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alice Hibbert

The National Landscape Area is important, although it is essential to provide more details on how the buffer will work in practice, and that there are sufficient powers to refuse future applications that impact this important landscape area.

Yes

ID sylw: 98723

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ginny White

It is important to have more details about the buffer zone and how it will work in practice, also to know that sufficient powers are in place to refuse future applications that may impact this important landscape area.

Other

ID sylw: 98843

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Philip Sykes

Whilst the Buffer Zone is a step in the right direction it is inadequate. 'Landscape' is by its very nature a big thing. A 3km buffer zone is way too small to achieve the necessary protection. Too timid.

Yes

ID sylw: 98947

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Roger Shimmin

The wording should be amended to show that AONB will remain the same , not just largely the same.

Yes

ID sylw: 99395

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Tania White

If an area is of outstanding natural beauty, it needs to be preserved to provide open spaces for people to enjoy

Yes

ID sylw: 99690

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

agree

Yes

ID sylw: 100069

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Coulsting

I do agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-46- Protecting the Cotswold National Landscape

Yes

ID sylw: 100456

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adrian Parsons

I absolutely agree with the approach laid out