BASE HEADER

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 43d-Urban Parks and Play Areas?

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 61 i 76 o 76

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102469

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy highlights the importance of integrating accessible, high-quality urban parks and play areas into new developments. These play an important role in promoting community well-being, social interaction, and environmental sustainability. By mandating the provision of these spaces, the policy ensures that residents have opportunities for recreation and leisure within their localities. To further enhance the policy's effectiveness, it is recommended to explicitly acknowledge the multifunctional benefits of green infrastructure and open spaces, including their contributions to health, biodiversity, and landscape integration. This holistic approach aligns with sustainable development principles and fosters vibrant, resilient communities.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102507

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

91. IM Land supports a policy regarding play provision. The Vision Document for the Land off Rumbush Lane includes opportunities ranging from children’s play to equipped fitness spaces to ensure that all members of the community are able to participate. 92. IM Land would welcome the opportunity to review and comment on the future guidance referred to within Draft Policy Direction 43d.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103018

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Bailey

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I agree.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103131

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes

Asiant : Marrons

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Whilst the importance of Urban Parks and Play areas is recognised, Policy Direction 43d is not specific as to when, or the extent to which development will be expected to contribute to these. Not all developments can be expected to provide a MUGA.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 104126

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Margaret Halligan

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Agree

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 104328

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Norrie

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes I agree.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 104472

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We agree and support this approach, recognising the importance of local active leisure and play opportunities in public health.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 104716

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neal Appleton

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There is a shortage of such areas in existing villages in particular. Where space is provided as part of a development, it should be made available to the whole community.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 104890

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Ann Colley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Not just multi games areas but also tennis courts, football pitches, etc

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105025

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Susan Ingleby

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 106672

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Property and Development Group

Asiant : Framptons

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes, we agree in principle with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 43d. However in the absence of details as to what “adequate play provision” represents for new developments, we reserve the right to comment further on this matter when future guidance has been published .

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 106986

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bellway Homes

Asiant : Savills

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy proposes that Multi Use Games Areas (MUGA) will be requested as part of Major development sites and the aspiration is that every resident will have a MUGA available to them within 15 minutes’ walk. The threshold to delivering MUGAs should only be required in line with national guidance such as the Fields for Trust guidance which sets a requirement of 0.3ha per 1,000 people. The threshold for ‘major’ development is significant. A site of just 11
dwellings could be counted as ‘major’ but it would not be appropriate for a scheme of this scale to deliver a MUGA. The provision of MUGAs should be agreed on a site by site basis.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 107187

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The issues covered in DPD 43 are welcomed and supported.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 107344

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford-on-Avon District Social Inclusion Partnership

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Accessible green spaces are well understood to have therapeutic capacity in health and wellbeing terms and we believe that these should be protected and accessible. Access to healthy and nutritious food is not always available to all residents so every opportunity should be taken to develop community orchards and allotments and the management and distribution networks supporting these initiatives which also assist in supporting good health and wellbeing and develop relationships and community. We agree with Draft Policy Direction 43a, 43b, 43c, 43d & 43e.

In respect of parks with equipment, these should in our opinion be sited on all-weather surfaces, so they remain accessible and safe places for children to access year round. Unfortunately, where surfaces become boggy or inaccessible during the winter, this can lead to the loss of a useful bumping space for months on end, during which communities lose access to import opportunities to enable outdoor play for children and places for parents to meet and build community.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 107763

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bellway Strategic Land

Asiant : Savills

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy proposes that Multi Use Games Areas (MUGA) will be requested as part of Major development sites and the aspiration is that every resident will have a MUGA available to them within 15 minutes’ walk. The threshold to delivering MUGAs should only be required in line with national guidance such as the Fields for Trust guidance which sets a requirement of 0.3ha per 1,000 people. The threshold for ‘major’ development is significant. A site of just 11 dwellings could be counted as ‘major’ but it would not be appropriate for a scheme of this scale to deliver a MUGA. The provision of MUGAs should be agreed on a site by site basis.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 108600

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy direction states that multi-use games areas (MUGAs) will be requested as part of all major development sites. In line with the definition in the glossary of the NPPF, a major residential development comprises 10 dwellings or more; a development of 10 dwellings is unlikely to generate the need for a new MUGA. Therefore, the policy should be amended to clarify that this requirement is only applicable to larger-scale major development (e.g. 100+ dwellings), providing that the evidence on need exists to justify this.