BASE HEADER

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-42-Trees, Hedges and Woodland?

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 31 i 60 o 199

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90456

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheetal Tailor

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

none

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90523

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Louise Stewart

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The principles are sound however the potential construction of 6700 new homes in BW will be in agricultural land which is currently bounded by hedgerows and ransom strips. During the course of the year starlings, deer, hares, weasels, otters, swifts, swallows and skylarks (amongst many other species) can be regularly seen and heard within the environs of this proposed new town. Building this town will completely destroy this beautiful habitat and further contribute to the extinction of the landscape and local wildlife. No amount of sterile urban planning will ever be able to compensate for this loss.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90557

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gavin Simpson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Plant, Plant, PLANT

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90604

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Pack

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No, the plan should set out a tree canopy target, as other Councils have done, to be more ambitious at a wider scale.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90687

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Littlewood

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

N/A

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90754

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Tim Goodwin

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Existing trees, copses and woodlands provide vital habitat for wildlife and must be protected and not bulldozed by developers chasing profit.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90949

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jason Lupton

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

dead, dying or dangerous - this shouldn't be used. Replace with dead, diseased or dangerous. The arguement is everything is technically dying.
Additional protection is needed for existing mature tree stock, re-survey the trees in the county and ensure the correct ones are protected.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91219

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91363

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Giles Dugmore

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Site 492 Land at The Greens, South of Alcester Road, SuA, and site 827 South of Alcester Road, SuA: Any development of this field will put at high risk the ancient hedgerow and trees surrounding the area. Whatever statements are made by developers we all know that they can be ignored with irreversible consequences for nature. The nearby example at The Burnside Hotel where the owner has ignored planning regulations is a case in point and is causing the council a lot of problems as well as annoying local residents. Leave the field as a field.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91404

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy as laid out is entirely lacking in ambition or commitment to the environment goals needed. Plans for a tree canopy target, as laid out by other Councils, should be added.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91464

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Bev Atkinson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Site 492 Land at The Greens, South of Alcester Road, Stratford-upon-Avon and site 827 South of Alcester Road, Stratford-upon-Avon.

Any development of this field will put at high risk the ancient hedgerow and trees surrounding the area. These are all protected and homes to a wide variety of biodiversity.

We all know that developers will often ignore the hedgerows and fields with irreversible consequences for nature. The recent example at The Burnside Hotel where planning regulations were ignored is an example of this. The council now has a problem and local residents are angry. Leave the field as a field.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91518

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mary Adams

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The plan should set out a tree canopy target, as other Councils have done, to be more ambitious at a wider scale.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91582

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No further comment

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91716

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Sensible

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91822

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tim Burridge

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No, the plan should set out a tree canopy target, as other Councils have done, to be more ambitious at a wider scale.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91863

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Hanno Kirner

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Protect what we have got

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91913

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Donna Goodwin

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Developers should be restricted from removing existing trees, copses and woodlands provide vital habitat for wildlife and must be protected.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 92063

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Salford Priors Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support the inclusion of a local tree policy that prioritises the retention of existing trees, woodlands, and hedgerows, recognising their invaluable ecological, environmental, and community benefits that take decades to fully develop. In supporting sustainable growth, all development proposals should be required to incorporate new tree planting to enhance sites, contributing to the green infrastructure. It should seek to address disparities in tree canopy cover across the district foster, healthier, more diverse, climate-resilient tree population. By working inclusively with Local Communities / Parish Councils, ensuring that tree preservation and planting efforts reflect the unique character and needs of each area.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 92101

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dee McGowan

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No, the plan should set out a tree canopy target, as other Councils have done, to be more ambitious at a wider scale.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 92150

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Patricia Scott

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I object to the term "trees of value". In too many instances developers employ consultancies who designate hedgerow trees as of little or no value and so they have been cut down and grubbed out. In fact the trees have simply been badly managed. Even neglected hedgerows perfom a function for wildlife, providing shelter and foraging resources for bats and insects. Similarly, dead and dying trees are an important resource for the insects which are the base of the food chain. I would also like to see the councils setting an ambitious target for tree canopy cover

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 92265

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Isobel McLauchlin

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I would like to see trees, hedges and woodland prioritised where possible.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 92351

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr G Wyatt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The tree canopy cover has not been stated as an objective.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 92435

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Christine Slaughter

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

SG18 Clopton Quarter would require removing established trees, hedges and woodland and destroying habitats.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 92506

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

While I agree in principle, I believe poor-quality agricultural land should be used to create new woodlands and bio-diverse environments for future generations. Strategic sites for new woodlands, wildlife, and insect habitats should be considered. Warwickshire has many potential sites, but the current plan lacks forward-thinking for new woodlands. Creating parks and open spaces within developments is good, but we should also focus on establishing new woodlands and make a real change and difference.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 92666

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Yates

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Agree but need additional planting to ensure the species survive when ancient trees die. In addition to helping reduce flooding by reducing amount of runoff from ever increasing rain fall

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 92704

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Heidi Ambrose-Brown

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

n/a

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 92727

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Luke Kempton

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No, the plan should set out a tree canopy target, as other Councils have done, to be more ambitious at a wider scale.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 92836

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carolyn Stacey

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Too much lost already and far better to maintain current trees than risk the failure of planting new ones.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 93015

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Dominic Momcilovic

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I agree, Trees, hedges and woodlands provide valuable habitats for wildlife and contribute to the character of the wider landscape and the overall amenity by contributing to high quality designed desirable locations to live and work

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 93209

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Martina Hunt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

SG18 could be considered as a wildlife development area, as it links directly to the Welcombe Hills and Clopton sanctuary area in front of Clopton House and up to the Obelisk.