BASE HEADER
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction –39- Environmental Net Gain?
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 100560
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Vanessa Chivers
Whilst I understand and fully support this policy in line with the 2024 law, any development on Hareway Lane X1 etc, would wipe out biodiversity almost 100%. It would be impossible to acheive a 10% net gain.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 100624
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Janine McComiskey
sounds like a great idea. I hope it can be put into practice.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 100714
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Drayton Manor Farms Ltd
Asiant : Stansgate Planning
No.
Whilst paragraph 187 of the Framework requires planning policies and decisions to contribute to
and enhance the natural and local environment there is currently no requirement, or indeed
reference, to Environmental Net Gain at a national level.
The Draft Policy Direction provides no justification for the inclusion of an ENG policy, nor any
information about how such a policy would function in practice. There are no other examples of
adopted Local Plan policies requiring ENG or any well-developed metric for measuring ENG. It is
likely to harm viability, duplicate BNG requirements, cause longer lead-in times and the uncertainty
could delay the deliverability of sites. As such this policy direction should be removed from the
emerging Plan
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 100748
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Gladman Developments
Gladman believe it is inappropriate and unjustified to require a specific percentage of Environmental Net Gain. This would sit alongside requirements to provide a minimum 10% BNG. There is a danger that going further than national policy will make development undeliverable and/or unviable. The mandatory requirement for 10% BNG is already proving more complicated and difficult to implement than envisaged particularly for SME housebuilders, a part of the sector the government is very keen to support. The introduction of yet another, as yet undefined and uncosted, regulatory burden will add further costs - financial, land-take and time, and unnecessarily increase uncertainty. It would feel like another hurdle for housebuilders to overcome to achieve planning permission on sites and would frustrate delivery of much needed market and affordable housing across the South Warwickshire area.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 100841
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Friends of Radfords Green Environment (FORGE)
It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101121
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Rowington Landowner Consortium
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP
Draft Policy Direction 39 offers an opportunity to integrate environmental enhancements, including biodiversity net gain through wildlife corridors, hedgerows, and wetlands. The policy's broader focus on environmental net gain, such as carbon sequestration, ensures that the development contributes to both local ecosystem restoration and long-term sustainability. The approach aligns with the SWLP goals, supporting sustainable growth and environmental stewardship while enhancing the local biodiversity and landscape.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101232
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mac Mic Group
Asiant : Marrons
Along with this Policy Direction, the concept of Environmental Net Gain is relatively nebulous at this stage, and not explicit in national planning policy. Mac Mic Group reserve the right to comment further as a comprehensive Framework is prepared. However, the Councils should be mindful of not duplicating policy requirements (with for instance biodiversity net gain and net zero policies) and ensure that any additional requirements are fully viability tested.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101332
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ashberry Strategic Land Ltd
Asiant : Stansgate Planning
Whilst paragraph 187 of the Framework requires planning policies and decisions to contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment there is currently no requirement, or indeed reference, to Environmental Net Gain at a national level.
The Draft Policy Direction provides no justification for the inclusion of an ENG policy, nor any information about how such a policy would function in practice. There are no other examples of adopted Local Plan policies requiring ENG or any well-developed metric for measuring ENG. It is likely to harm viability, duplicate BNG requirements, cause longer lead-in times and the uncertainty could delay the deliverability of sites. As such this policy direction should be removed from the emerging Plan
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101381
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bellway Strategic Land / Ashberry Strategic Land
Asiant : Marrons
No evidence has been published to justify its inclusion or how this policy would work in practice. object to the approach laid out in this policy, particularly the production of a ‘greening factor’ to establish the levels of green infrastructure that will be required for major development. This policy will need robust evidence to demonstrate that this is feasible, deliverable and does not impact on viability, especially when combined with other requirements such as Biodiversity Net Gain and Environmental Net Gain. The policy needs to be justified and will require proportionate evidence in line with paragraph 36 of the NPPF.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101543
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hallam Land
Asiant : Marrons
Greater clarity is required in relation to what this policy will require, how it will be measured, and what its implications are for delivery in terms of viability and density.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101607
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Zoe Leventhal
Support. This emerging policy feels like work in early progress. Research needs to be done on other authorities that have introduced similar policies. It will be important to avoid overlap with DPD 38 (BNG) so as not to increase the burden on developers through duplication. A clear definition of how ENG goes above and beyond BNG is important as is how ENG will be measured.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101608
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bellway Homes Ltd
Asiant : Stansgate Planning
Whilst paragraph 187 of the Framework requires planning policies and decisions to contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment there is currently no requirement, or indeed reference, to Environmental Net Gain at a national level.
The Draft Policy Direction provides no justification for the inclusion of an ENG policy, nor any information about how such a policy would function in practice. There are no other examples of adopted Local Plan policies requiring ENG or any well-developed metric for measuring ENG. It is likely to harm viability, duplicate BNG requirements, cause longer lead-in times and the uncertainty could delay the deliverability of sites. As such this policy direction should be removed from the emerging Plan.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101689
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Bart Slob
I agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-39 on Environmental Net Gain (ENG). Expanding the focus beyond biodiversity to include other ecosystem services such as air and water quality, climate resilience, and flood management is a positive step toward achieving a holistic and sustainable environmental framework. However, it is crucial that ENG requirements are closely aligned with local priorities, including safeguarding areas like SG04, where any development should demonstrate clear benefits to the environment. Additionally, it is essential that the delivery of ENG is well-supported by evidence, ensuring that these measures are both practical and effective.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101730
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Rollason
This development is not good for the area
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101907
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101976
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Isabel Collins
improving public transport links is what is needed more
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102035
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Bianca Hollis
Why is the council still using pesticides on the grass verges along Avon Crescent, Dale Avenue and Banbury Road??
I’m deeply concerned by The River Avon being polluted. Wildlife, plants, soils and humans are suffering.
The town air is terribly polluted and the traffic is terrible!
Transport and air and water pollution must be addressed!
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102208
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hallam Land
Asiant : LRM Planning
Our comments in relation to BNG are amplified in the context of Environmental Net Gain. To heighten the extent to which BNG should exceed the statutory minimum, and then to add a separate burden of environmental net gain, risks compounding the extent to which other legitimate development objectives can be achieved.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102227
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited
Asiant : Turley
Consideration will need to be given to how any additional requirements would impact site deliverability and viability, with sufficient evidence provided to demonstrate and justify the need to go above and beyond national standards.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102416
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Asiant : Turley
Taylor Wimpey welcome the opportunity to comment further on any environmental net gain policy. Again, consideration should be given to how any additional requirements would impact site deliverability/viability, and sufficient evidence provided to demonstrate and justify the need to go above and beyond national standards.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102802
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: The Ragley Estate
Asiant : Stansgate Planning
Whilst paragraph 187 of the Framework requires planning policies and decisions to contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment there is currently no requirement, or indeed reference, to Environmental Net Gain at a national level.
The Draft Policy Direction provides no justification for the inclusion of an ENG policy, nor any information about how such a policy would function in practice. There are no other examples of adopted Local Plan policies requiring ENG or any well-developed metric for measuring ENG. It is likely to harm viability, duplicate BNG requirements, cause longer lead-in times and the uncertainty could delay the deliverability of sites. As such this policy direction should be removed from the emerging Plan.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102857
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Turley
The University supports the concept of Environmental Net Gain. However, consider that as currently drafted, the draft policy direction does not include enough detail on which to provide significant comments at this stage. The draft policy direction states that the Council’s aim to have a policy that requires development to contribute positively to the natural environment by providing measurable net improvements in biodiversity and ecosystem services. The University would request that clarification be provided on how such requirements will be measured and controlled and what evidence is going to be used to support this policy.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103004
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr David Bailey
I agree.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103142
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Jem Brown
A holistic view of a healthy environment is badly needed - for our nature but also the health of the citizens of South Warwickshire.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103261
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Elizabeth Simpson Yates
I support the development of a comprehensive ENG framework, so we can deliver meaningful environmental protections.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103690
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Salford Road, Bidford-on-Avon
Asiant : Turley
Richborough note that this is an emerging area of policy and highlight the justification text at page 158 of the Preferred Options Plan, which states: “Further evidence is required to demonstrate the need for Environmental Net Gain and to help formulate specific policies for the Local Plan”. Until this further information is available to demonstrate there is a need for Environmental Net Gain Strategy, stakeholders are unable to provide a robust response.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103691
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
Richborough note that this is an emerging area of policy and highlight the justification text at page 158 of the Preferred Options Plan, which states: “Further evidence is required to demonstrate the need for Environmental Net Gain and to help formulate specific policies for the Local Plan”. Until this further information is available to demonstrate there is a need for Environmental Net Gain Strategy, stakeholders are unable to provide a robust response.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103692
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Lighthorne Road, Kineton
Asiant : Turley
Richborough note that this is an emerging area of policy and highlight the justification text at page 158 of the Preferred Options Plan, which states: “Further evidence is required to demonstrate the need for Environmental Net Gain and to help formulate specific policies for the Local Plan”. Until this further information is available to demonstrate there is a need for Environmental Net Gain Strategy, stakeholders are unable to provide a robust response.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103694
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Asiant : Turley
Richborough note that this is an emerging area of policy and highlight the justification text at page 158 of the Preferred Options Plan, which states: “Further evidence is required to demonstrate the need for Environmental Net Gain and to help formulate specific policies for the Local Plan”. Until this further information is available to demonstrate there is a need for Environmental Net Gain Strategy, stakeholders are unable to provide a robust response.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103696
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne
Asiant : Turley
Richborough note that this is an emerging area of policy and highlight the justification text at page 158 of the Preferred Options Plan, which states: “Further evidence is required to demonstrate the need for Environmental Net Gain and to help formulate specific policies for the Local Plan”. Until this further information is available to demonstrate there is a need for Environmental Net Gain Strategy, stakeholders are unable to provide a robust response.