BASE HEADER
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy G- Climate Resilient Design?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86097
Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie
N/A
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86470
Derbyniwyd: 26/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs vivien bryer
Very thorough proposals.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86677
Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater
Adapting to Climate Crisis will also support reducing global warming.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86927
Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming
More unmaintainable buildings are not the solution
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87075
Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025
Ymatebydd: S Gardner
There is limited demonstration of what this means - is this just the new build of the existing building too? How would this be achieved in older properties which may not accommodate these types of requirements.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87407
Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day
Does this also apply to heritage properties?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87587
Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025
Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris
I agree
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88455
Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr A Patrick
These requirements need to be consistent with the winter energy efficiency solutions. That probably means level 3 or 4 is required and with a defined air tightness.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88715
Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89064
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
i agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89208
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Durk
The cooling parts of this are particularly important. It would be disastrous if the installation of air conditioning to cope with higher temperatures became an acceptable standard in new houses.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89268
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Jon Knight
Climate change is going to bring many challenges to us over the period of the SWLP, including extreme weather events, changing rainfall amounts/distributions and hotter summers. As such the draft policy would appear to be a self-evident good.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89477
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson
Presumably we can base out climate change checklist on Stratford's existing ones and improve if necessary.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89665
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Finham Brook Flood Action Group
none
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90421
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Chris Tagg
Passive should be the aim
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90490
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Dr Louise Stewart
All proposals here are absolutely commendable although fatuous in the face of net 1.5c having already been exceeded and current policy in every first world country to continue exploring and use of fossil fuels. The proposed national focus in AI also has a significant energy resource, further compounding the challenge. However the key point here is that BW , as an area of strategic growth is proposed for land that already floods regularly. Therefore it cannot be seriously entertained as an appropriate site for construction of c7000 additional properties due to the lack of anywhere for appropriate run off.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91181
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council
Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91675
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman
Sensible
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91773
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Taylor
I this fr all development - including self-build? Again this is a lot of work for self builders with one building vs developers, without any guidance etc.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92468
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Julian Brown
Agree
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92596
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: The Planning Bureau Ltd
In order for the future plan to be found sound the following should be implemented:
• Any future policy should be stepped in line with emerging government targets and requirements and
• Ensure the policy is properly assessed within the forthcoming viability assessment
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92994
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Blake
Makes sense
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93141
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Dr Penny Gray
All these initiatives are so important in reducing the impacts of the climate emergency locally and globally. Stratford will be more susceptible than many areas of the UK to flooding in particular, as it's located on a river, which is flooding with increasing frequency.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93189
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Checkley
I fully support the approach laid out in Draft Policy G
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93256
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Coulsting
I agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy G- Climate Resilient Design. Next stpes should include required methodology, e.g. TM52, TM59 or Passivhaus, where not already sufficiently covered by the building regulations.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93463
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council
The proposal to introduce a climate change checklist - having seen the current version of this in various planning applications it appears to be tokenistic so not much point unless it actually has an impact on planning decisions.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93684
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong
Yes, but each goal here is subjective and it is critical that more than 'consideration' is given to parts of the hierarchy. I would support stronger language, i.e. the hierarchy should be 'required' to be followed barring independent assessment, robust assessment of viability arguments demonstrating it cannot be. Specific guidelines should be given where possible to encourage good design.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93826
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwick District Green Party
Most of this is suitable. However, new buildings should have air tightness of <0.6 air changes per hour (see Draft Policy Direction-22) which necessitates mechanical ventilation with heat recovery.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94121
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Stuart Mace
Focus appears to be on a warming climate, but does not appear to have considered situations of a cooling climate where increased demand for heating would occur. Climate change is not just hotter weather, and the British Isles has always had variable weather conditions so a range of factors ought to be being considered. Where external provision is made e.g. for shade, then those developments ought to consider the future maintenance costs arising from plantations of trees, cleaning of shelters and flushing of SuDS systems to prevent infestations of mosquitoes in stagnant water.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94989
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: David Gosling
no further comment