No

ID sylw: 102528

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Margaret Halligan

See my previous comment on people being completely unaware of the plans and the consultation and only being made aware by another local resident making a comment on Facebook- this is not acceptable

No

ID sylw: 102619

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Christine Easton

Again 25 years is too long.
HS 2 is an ongoing issue
Change of councils is an issue
Change of government's is an issue.

Other

ID sylw: 102640

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

The Plan is in 2 parts which means that our clients might not find out whether their site forms part of the plan for many years. The distinction between Parts 1 and 2 is unclear. Existing draft plans - such as the Stratford Site Allocations appear to be left 'hanging' in a state where they are not completed. The plan looking forward 25 years is supported but it is highly unlikely that any significant contribution will be forthcoming from a new settlement for a decade. Site 515 is immediately available.

Yes

ID sylw: 102657

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Vos

Broadly support - with concerns about suitability of some sites and the lack of detail on infrastrcuture

Other

ID sylw: 102698

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Elizabeth White

‘You may respond to as many, or as few of these draft policy directions, draft policies, strategic growth locations, and potential new settlement locations as you wish.’

Does not mention here commenting on ‘a specific site proposal or the HELAA results’ (4.1).

No

ID sylw: 102711

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nick Alexander

People are not able to have their say on matters due to the complexity of this document. I can’t even work out whether I am on the portal or not!

No

ID sylw: 102753

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Elizabeth Browne

Scoring of areas is flawed as:
(1) Not sufficiently up to date to take into account other changes in the areas that have already happened or are planned. An up to date assessment must be taken before any decisions can be made.
(2) Not given any consideration to the impact on the Green Belt due to HS2
(3) Not considered the impact on a grade 1 listed site of Kenilworth Castle.
(4) Inadequate consideration given to how the current infrastructure could cope with the proposed changes, namely local roads and amenities.

No

ID sylw: 102843

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jane Sale

A lot of the proposed sites are on green belt land, so yet more of the countryside is being destroyed. People pay a premium for their properties to live in the open space. The roads surrounding are already really busy, more houses will just add to this. Also, what about schools and healthcare practices. They are designed atm to cater for the number of houses in the area, not hundreds more. It’s already a struggle to get a doctor’s appointment at the best of times. Will new schools, doctors etc be built for the influx of people?

No

ID sylw: 102905

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Giles Harrison-Hall

You require binary choice when often the response would be more nuanced

Other

ID sylw: 102972

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

This consultation is not geared to the general public. It is not user friendly and is difficult for the layman to engage. Attendance at one of the public sessions proved to be unsatisfactory as it was not hosted well...difficult to discuss how the sites were arrived at and clear that the preferred sites are rather more arbitrary. How can land along side railway lines with no railway stations and only road infrastructure I.E Preferred site F1 be deemed to meet sustainability objectives?

Other

ID sylw: 103114

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Summers Family

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

The Plan is in 2 parts which means that our clients might not find out whether their site forms part of the plan for many years. The distinction between Parts 1 and 2 is unclear. Existing draft plans - such as the Stratford Site Allocations appear to be left 'hanging' in a state where they are not completed.

The plan looking forward 25 years is supported but it is highly unlikely that any significant contribution will be forthcoming from a new settlement for a decade.

Site 518 is immediately available.

No

ID sylw: 103139

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr philip cooper

The scale of increase is far more than can be achieved. Proportional growth is reasonable not an increase of over 100%

No

ID sylw: 103361

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Abigail Haley

Warwickshire already has approximately 15 years’ reserves excluding recycled aggregates. The UK is one of the leaders in recycled aggregate usage in Europe - 28% of annual demand is met this way.

In addition, a new quarry will have other serious impacts on all our communities:
increased traffic, pollution and noise
greater risk of flooding
harmful airborne particulates causing health risks to nearby communities
loss of best quality farmland
increased food insecurity
loss of heritage & wildlife

No

ID sylw: 103374

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Joe Rukin

This consultation is exceptionally unwieldy. the idea that you have to submit a response and a summary is grossly unfair. It suggests that you're only actually going to bother reading the summary.

Other

ID sylw: 103384

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sarah Shalgosky

The proposed areas of new housing and development include important local wildlife sites, and loss of these sites and increased activity in these areas would threaten biodiversity.

No

ID sylw: 103526

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Oli Lorimer

No

No

ID sylw: 103535

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Stephinson

SG06 West of A452 Kenilworth Rd prone to flooding see Gov Flooding Map, removal of field soak aways, close proximity to River Avon, warming climate more rain, exasperates damage.
3,000 houses = ~4,290 additional vehicles, these can be accommodated? In 2016 ~13,000 vehicles into L/Spa, ~11,000 to Coventry. Increases risk to K2L cycling lane.
Have you asked Warwick Hospital, GP Surgeries, NHS Dentists they can support another ~7,200 people?
Is Warwickshire enabling more food imports with the loss of farming land, undermining self-sufficiency?
Has a thorough study been undertaken, listing associated costs, to properly address notable environmental and infrastructural challenges?

No

ID sylw: 103630

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Paula Kiley

Why are you supporting so many houses to be built?
Why are you allowing greenbelt to be destroyed?
Why are you allowing Coventry & Warwickshire to be geographically joined up?

I disagree with the proposal to build on greenbelt and to build additional houses unnecessarily.

Poor infrastructure is in place as there are inadequate health services including GP services to support influx of people in the locality.

No

ID sylw: 103714

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Mark Tindale

This is a poor consultation document, it is difficult to read and very complex. Simply allow us to comment on the proposals as a whole. This consultation should be reset and undertaken in a more appropriate, user friendly and accessible manner so that normal people can access it and comment.

No

ID sylw: 103839

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Eleanor Caudwell

There is no need to designate this (long Marston, Clifford chambers for more new build housing.

No

ID sylw: 103863

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Michelle Blackburn

I do not agree with any other housing proposals. These proposals are destroying the country side, the nature and adding to pollution and increased flooding to areas that already have flooding issues.
Not to mention the devalue of my property which is situated in one of the villages, I purchased my house because of the views and this proposal wants to build houses on the land at the back of my property!!!!!
You have also made this portal extremely difficult to find and for people to have their say, why make it so hard????

No

ID sylw: 103868

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Maddy Gralak

I strongly disagree with the proposals around Hampton Magna (reference IDs: 245, 119, 621, 68, 233, 95, 573, 55) and Hatton B1. The is no sufficient infrastructure to support the developments and it would put excessive pressure on local amenities. It is also building on green belt land and there is no consideration for the wild belt. Such excessive development would destroy the local area and it would lose everything about what makes it a peaceful place to live.

https://www.warwickshirewildlifetrust.org.uk/south-warwickshire-local-plan

No

ID sylw: 103936

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Olivia McCullough

As a local resident I do not support the proposals to build additional houses around Hatton as it the roads couldn't cope with the traffic, our countryside will be destroyed and there is not the infrastructure of schools, shops, doctors to support anywhere near the numbers proposed.

No

ID sylw: 104001

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Charn Gill

Broad Lane is already an extremely busy road with houses lining either side. The speed limit of 40 is dangerous, there are extremely poor paths for pedestrians which are narrow and with speeding cars and lorries it is unsafe. Further development in the area of Wood End and Tanworth-in-Arden would make this road unsustainable with the amount of traffic. It would also become even more unsafe than it already is! It is already too dangerous for children to walk to school, for commuters to walk to the train station. This situation will only get worse.

No

ID sylw: 104046

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Charlotte Moss

I object to the following sites (with reasons detailed below):
-SG15
-SG16
-X1
-Westham Lane, Barford
-Land at Long Meadow, Westham Lane, Barford, CV35 8DP
-Land adjoining College Farmhouse, Wasperton, Warwick, CV35 8EB
-Glebe Farm, Wellesbourne Road, Wasperton, CV35 8EE

Other

ID sylw: 104155

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Rachel Pope

I appreciate that you have tried very hard to make the process accessible both online and in public libraries. However, this consultation comprises much more than just the consultation document itself, and even that is 187 pages long. The number of supporting documents and the level of detail and specialist terminology make it too onerous for lay people to digest fully, putting people off and resulting in fewer or partial replies. By contrast, developers will have teams of people dedicated to responding comprehensively and with the appropriate terminology. This is understandable but should be taken into account when analysing responses.

No

ID sylw: 104223

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Craig Stone

insufficient time for a very large scale set of projects, suspect the consultation time is too short considering development rules, feedback process is not simple further adding to low feedback bias.
call for sites biases to those who know with out proactive look to brown and grey field sites above and beyond green field

No

ID sylw: 104236

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Dale Fitzsimmons

Kenilworth and surrounding areas has had far too much housing development in recent years for the size of town it is. The town’s schools, GP, dentists, nurseries, roads, parks, car park etc cannot cope as it currently is.
The council must consider alternative sites away from Kenilworth until the new developments & communities have settled.
Furthermore the addition of even more new build houses de-values the entire area through cheap house building, and flooding the area with more houses & people.
Further developments is NOT essential for Kenilworth, and MUST be avoided.

No

ID sylw: 104241

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Chris Greenly

I object to the proposals:
Destruction of our green belt, biodiversity and misuse of prime farm land endangering food security.
Destruction of habitat and unchecked urban creep when alternative brownfield sites are available and should be prioritised for new homes.
Failure to take into account the needs of current and future residents
Increased air pollution exacerbated by the lack of affordable Green transportation.
Impact on an already over stretched local infrastructure - schools, hospitals, roads, GP provision and railways which will not be able support the increase of homes in a rural area proposed in the south Warwickshire local plan.

No

ID sylw: 104522

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Susan Hood

Call for sites is very narrow - does not consider other smaller sites, infill or the impact of taking green belt land etc..

Commenting on this plan is incredibly difficult and not easy to understand/do.
The piecemeal/section by section approach makes it unclear how to make observations.