BASE HEADER
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options for Sites
ID sylw: 64282
Derbyniwyd: 10/03/2014
Ymatebydd: Phillip Dix
 You deem this site to be good option and have given it  'green' rating.
I can only assume you have ignored all your own stated criteria and decided to ignore valid points already highlighted:
Green Belt 
Would destroy countryside 
Access will increase traffic hazards on fast/dangerous road with bend limiting visibility 
Close to heavily populated urban area and highly visible 
Distracting to passing motorists 
Schools oversubscribed 
Canal bridge suffers from subsidence and unsuitable for heavy vehicles/narrow for caravans 
Site breaching law for years with caravans occupying site. 
Potential for unauthorised expansion 
Negative effect on property values 
Unattractive approach to Warwick/effect on tourism 
Canal recently upgraded towpath and locks are 
popular with walkers/family groups/canal cruisers/anglers 
Direct access to Canal from points at Oaklands 
Farm. Leakage of noise/waste onto canal bank 
Impact on natural/historic environment 
GP surgery already stretched 
Dentists at capacity 
Any further development to small community on Birmingham 
Road will spoil quality of life 
Should be well away from existing communities 
Would hamper any future development of housing 
Possibility of ribbon development in green belt 
Close to railway lines and bridges 
Close to petrol station with dangers of waiting vehicles on road,fumes, emissions and pollutants 
Effect on cleanliness/tidiness of canal and towpath 
I would like to formally object to the option of having the Gypsies and Travellers site located at the following area:
GT19 - Land off Birmingham Rd, Budbrooke, Oaklands Farm
 I note in your appendix 2 from the formal council meeting that you deem this site to be a good option for the site (and have given it a 'green' rating).
In doing so, I can only assume you have ignored all your own stated criteria for such an assessment and have decided to ignore the valid points already highlighted as objections (shown below to remind you):
* Green Belt land that should be preserved 
* Would destroy countryside 
* Access onto main road will increase traffic hazards. Notoriously 
difficult and dangerous road with speeds in excess of 40mph 
limit and bend in road limiting visibility 
* Close to heavily populated urban area and highly visible so not in 
keeping with locality 
* Distracting to passing motorists 
* Schools are oversubscribed 
* Canal bridge suffers from subsidence and unsuitable for heavy 
vehicles and very narrow for caravans 
* Site has been breaching law for years with caravans occupying 
the site. To legalise is sending a bad message 
* Potential for unauthorised expansion 
* Negative effect on property values 
* Unattractive on approach to Warwick 
* Effect on tourism 
* Grand Union Canal recently upgraded towpath and locks are 
popular with walkers, family groups, canal cruisers and anglers 
* Direct access to the Canal from at least two points at Oaklands 
Farm. Leakage of noise and waste onto canal bank 
* Impact on important features of natural and historic 
environment 
* GP surgery already stretched 
* Dentists at capacity 
* Any further development to small community on Birmingham 
Road will spoil quality of life 
* Should be well away from existing communities 
* Would hamper any future development of housing 
* Possibility of ribbon development in green belt 
* Close to railway lines and bridges 
* Close to petrol station with dangers of waiting vehicles on road, 
fumes, emissions and pollutants 
* Effect on cleanliness and tidiness of canal and towpath 
I therefore would like to formally add my objections to this site as a local resident for all the reasons outlined above.