Sustainable Buildings SPD
Search representations
Results for Kenilworth Town Council search
New searchObject
Sustainable Buildings SPD
5.2
Representation ID: 77
Received: 10/10/2008
Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council
Objects to the contradiction between sections 4 and 5 with regard to new development and home extensions. There is concern that some developers may try to thwart the objectives while domestic extensions may be unreasonably denied particularly in older un insulated properties where using latest building regulations without applying renewables could acheive a greater energy saving.
Objects to the contradiction between sections 4 and 5 with regard to new development and home extensions. There is concern that some developers may try to thwart the objectives while domestic extensions may be unreasonably denied particularly in older un insulated properties where using latest building regulations without applying renewables could acheive a greater energy saving.
Paragraph 8.4 should reflect the latest mandate that only permeable surfaces to domestic driveways shall be allowed.
It is questioned whether the renewable toolkits are representative. Do they consider acquisition in terms of carbon costs and whole life costs (reliability / maintainability) that would contribute to future carbon footprint through spares. Does the toolkit compare the relative merits of different types of renewable energy sources.
Comment
Sustainable Buildings SPD
8.4
Representation ID: 78
Received: 10/10/2008
Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council
Paragraph 8.4 should reflect the latest mandate that only permeable surfaces to domestic driveways shall be allowed.
Objects to the contradiction between sections 4 and 5 with regard to new development and home extensions. There is concern that some developers may try to thwart the objectives while domestic extensions may be unreasonably denied particularly in older un insulated properties where using latest building regulations without applying renewables could acheive a greater energy saving.
Paragraph 8.4 should reflect the latest mandate that only permeable surfaces to domestic driveways shall be allowed.
It is questioned whether the renewable toolkits are representative. Do they consider acquisition in terms of carbon costs and whole life costs (reliability / maintainability) that would contribute to future carbon footprint through spares. Does the toolkit compare the relative merits of different types of renewable energy sources.
Comment
Sustainable Buildings SPD
5.11
Representation ID: 79
Received: 10/10/2008
Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council
It is questioned whether the renewable toolkits are representative. Do they consider acquisition in terms of carbon costs and whole life costs (reliability / maintainability) that would contribute to future carbon footprint through spares. Does the toolkit compare the relative merits of different types of renewable energy sources.
Objects to the contradiction between sections 4 and 5 with regard to new development and home extensions. There is concern that some developers may try to thwart the objectives while domestic extensions may be unreasonably denied particularly in older un insulated properties where using latest building regulations without applying renewables could acheive a greater energy saving.
Paragraph 8.4 should reflect the latest mandate that only permeable surfaces to domestic driveways shall be allowed.
It is questioned whether the renewable toolkits are representative. Do they consider acquisition in terms of carbon costs and whole life costs (reliability / maintainability) that would contribute to future carbon footprint through spares. Does the toolkit compare the relative merits of different types of renewable energy sources.
