Publication Draft
Search representations
Results for Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council search
New searchSupport
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Preferred Vision for Warwick District to 2026?
Representation ID: 2918
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Yes.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Preferred Growth Strategy for Warwick District to 2026?
Representation ID: 2919
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
The facilities/infrastructure are neither available nor easily provided.
Major traffic issues into/out of Leamington and Warwick. Will need significant road improvements and at least an extra river crossing.
Section 3.14
Points 3 and 4 are fine but bullet points 1,2 and 5 should be changed to spread development more evenly over the FOUR towns, the A46 corridor and south of Coventry.
Finham should be targeted as the prime location for placement of the bulk of extra housing allocated to WDC, in particular accommodating the expected influx from the major conurbations.
It should not be allocated to accommodate Coventry's allocation.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new employment land?
Representation ID: 2920
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
This council believes that the WDC has identified appropriate locations with the serious exceptions that Lower Heathcote/south of Harbury Lane should be retained as an area of restraint to preserve valuable agricultural land and respect the natural boundary to development provided by Harbury Lane.
This council also believes that the area at Finham/south of Coventry should be used to accommodate WDC's allocation of employment land rather than being yielded to Coventry for its needs.
Object
Publication Draft
(i) Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane
Representation ID: 2922
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
STRONGLY OBJECT - This land must be retained as an area of restraint to properly separate Bishops Tachbrook from the major towns and also to preserve excellent agricultural land.
Support
Publication Draft
(ii) Land west of Europa Way, Warwick
Representation ID: 2923
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Subject to a balanced spread of development over the four towns and wider district this land represents reasonable infill and has reasonable access to infrastructure without imposing excessive demands.
Support
Publication Draft
(iii) Land at Thickthorn, Kenilworth
Representation ID: 2924
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
This area contributes well towards spreading the allocations over the wider district and has good access to established infrastructure - a natural choice.
Comment
Publication Draft
(iv) Land at Kings Hill, south of Green Lane, Finham
Representation ID: 2925
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Object if reserved for Coventry allocation.
Support if taking a significant part of WDC allocation and assisting in spreading the WDC allocation across the whole district. This is a good site for development as it is adjacent to good infrastructure and has good access to the motorway network.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Tourism, particularly in respect of visitor accommodation?
Representation ID: 2926
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support subject to making the option district-wide (OR at very least the FOUR towns - Kenilworth Castle!!! - has it been forgotten?) - The aim should be to maintain all tourist facilities wherever possible unless they can be convincingly shown to be no-viable.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Rural Communities?
Representation ID: 2927
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Rural Communities, particularly in respect of rural housing?
Representation ID: 2928
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
This Preferred option is thoroughly welcomed provided proper, full, local consultation and meeting only the community's clearly identified needs (and wishes) is irrevocably enshrined policy.