Publication Draft

Search representations

Results for Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd search

New search New search

Object

Publication Draft

Do you agree with the Preferred Growth Strategy for Warwick District to 2026?

Representation ID: 33655

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

Support directing most of the growth to Leamington/Warwick with some growth in the rural areas.

Object to the inherent imbalance of focussing development to the south. In addition to the land to the south, there is a need to allocate land to the north to ensure a balanced approach to housing delivery. By not providing employment land to the north, you are simply encouraging continued journeys through the town centre to the existing employment areas.

Comment

Publication Draft

Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new employment land?

Representation ID: 33659

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

We can support and deliver a proportion of employment land on the land to the north of Milverton to meet a locally identified need. Accept that land to the south is more suitable to accommodate employment development, but should the housing numbers increase then there will be a need for additional employment land.

Comment

Publication Draft

Do you support or object to levels of housing growth higher than those proposed by the Preferred Options?

Representation ID: 33663

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

Flexibility should be built into the document at this stage to accommodate an increase in housing numbers or potential non-delivery of sites.

There is an identified need for an additional 5,000 dwellings and as a result there is a need to allocate additional land north of Milverton for 1,800 dwellings plus employment.

Object

Publication Draft

(i) Land at Former Ford Foundry, Leamington

Representation ID: 33665

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

Do not consider this site will be delivered before 2016 due to little developer interest and the number of constraints to this brownfield site.

Object

Publication Draft

(ii) Land at Station Approach, Leamington

Representation ID: 33666

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

Do not consider this site will be delivered before 2016 due to little developer interest and the number of constraints to this brownfield site.

Object

Publication Draft

Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?

Representation ID: 33667

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

Thre is an over reliance on windfalls. There are only a limited number of brownfield sites suitable for development within the town centres. Reliance on past trends is unrealistic given the market we are now in.

Windfall assumptions should be halved in order to ensure there is more confidence in meeting housing targets. Additional land should be allocated to make up the difference, at land north of Milverton. The loss of Green Belt is outweighed by the need for housing.

Object

Publication Draft

Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing a mix of new housing?

Representation ID: 33668

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

Do not wish to see a prescriptive housing mix included for strategic sites to apply for the whole plan period. Any mix has to take account of housing need and local market demand.

Object

Publication Draft

Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing affordable homes?

Representation ID: 33669

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

Do not support an affordable housing requirement of 50% as there is no basis for the figure.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.