Publication Draft
Search representations
Results for Thomas Bates & Son LTD search
New searchSupport
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Preferred Vision for Warwick District to 2026?
Representation ID: 33558
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Thomas Bates & Son LTD
Agent: Andrew Martin Associates
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Preferred Growth Strategy for Warwick District to 2026?
Representation ID: 33559
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Thomas Bates & Son LTD
Agent: Andrew Martin Associates
Support the proposal to direct growth to within and adjoining the combined urban areas of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash as it is consistent with RSS and minimises loss of Green Belt.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Strategic Objectives for Warwick District?
Representation ID: 33560
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Thomas Bates & Son LTD
Agent: Andrew Martin Associates
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?
Representation ID: 33561
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Thomas Bates & Son LTD
Agent: Andrew Martin Associates
Reasonable options have been identified. To meet the additional RSS requirement of 7,000 dwellings, consideration should be given to increasing the capacity of some of the identified locations.
Support
Publication Draft
(v) Land at Woodside Farm, north of Harbury Lane, Whitnash
Representation ID: 33562
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Thomas Bates & Son LTD
Agent: Andrew Martin Associates
Support the preferred option for growth at Woodside Farm. The site is physically well contained and adjoins the urban edge of Whitnash. The site is available now, suitable and viable for development. The site can accommodate a mix of house types, affordable, sustainable buildings, access to community facilities, green space and footpaths. Vehicular access can be secured and the development can offer improvements to public transport.
The visual impact of development will be localised. A landscaping plan would protect existing properties.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing a mix of new housing?
Representation ID: 33563
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Thomas Bates & Son LTD
Agent: Andrew Martin Associates
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing affordable homes?
Representation ID: 33564
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Thomas Bates & Son LTD
Agent: Andrew Martin Associates
There should be flexibility over affordable housing targets in the current economic climate.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for the density of new housing?
Representation ID: 33565
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Thomas Bates & Son LTD
Agent: Andrew Martin Associates
Support
Comment
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to levels of housing growth higher than those proposed by the Preferred Options?
Representation ID: 33566
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Thomas Bates & Son LTD
Agent: Andrew Martin Associates
Some of the sites identified for development can cater for increased levels of growth than those set out in the Preferred Options.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you think the Council should adopt the Community Infrastructure Levy approach to securing developer contributions?
Representation ID: 33567
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Thomas Bates & Son LTD
Agent: Andrew Martin Associates
A sinlge formulae is not appropriate. In the current economic climate the demand for contributions should not be too high so as to render schemes to be non viable particularly where much needed affordable housing contributions are proposed to meet the current high demand.
