Publication Draft
Search representations
Results for Rail Property Ltd & Network Rail Infrastructure search
New searchObject
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new employment land?
Representation ID: 33530
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Rail Property Ltd & Network Rail Infrastructure
Agent: G R Planning Consultancy Ltd
The allocation of the Former Goods Yard site in the adopted Local Plan for employment uses (specifically B1 development) should be maintained. This allocation should be promoted in conjunction with the potential for the site to also be developed for residential purposes as part of the comprehensive redevelopment of the Stagecoach and Former Quick's Garage sites.
In relation to the smaller BRBR site, there is no reason as to why this should not be allocated for residential development with the option of it being developed separately.
Object
Publication Draft
(ii) Land at Station Approach, Leamington
Representation ID: 33534
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Rail Property Ltd & Network Rail Infrastructure
Agent: G R Planning Consultancy Ltd
Do not object in principle to the allocation of the Former Goods Yard and smaller BRBR site for housing. What they object to is its allocation for 'Housing Only'. The site should be allocated for either employment (B1) and/or housing to provide greater flexibility, to improve the marketability of the sites and the likelihood of them coming forward for development within a reasonable time period.
There is no planning justification for the phasing approach to this site.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing affordable homes?
Representation ID: 33535
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Rail Property Ltd & Network Rail Infrastructure
Agent: G R Planning Consultancy Ltd
Targets for the provision of affordable housing have no reference or regard to current and likely future market conditions or the commercial viability of achieving such targets as required by paragraph 29 of PPS3 and paragraph B10 of Circular 05/2005.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for the density of new housing?
Representation ID: 33538
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Rail Property Ltd & Network Rail Infrastructure
Agent: G R Planning Consultancy Ltd
Density for housing on the 'Land at Station Area' is far too low and unjustified and should therefore be revised.
Comment
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new employment land?
Representation ID: 33539
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Rail Property Ltd & Network Rail Infrastructure
Agent: G R Planning Consultancy Ltd
We would request therefore that the DCS include a further employment allocation to accommodate a relocated Bus Depot. In our view (and as the Station Area Brief accepts within its written text) the former Ford Car Park site remains the best and most suitable location to accommodate Stagecoach's requirements.
