Issue and Options 2023

Back to document

Search form responses

Results for Bluecrest Land search

New search

Form ID: 81252

Respondent: Bluecrest Land

Agent: Warner Planning

Q-V3.1: Do you agree that the Vision and Strategic Objectives are appropriate?

Nothing chosen

Q-V3.2: If no, please indicate why

We largely agree with the Vision and Strategic Objectives as set out, but would welcome the specific inclusions of homes also be delivered in all locations to cater to the needs of all potential occupiers.

Form ID: 81253

Respondent: Bluecrest Land

Agent: Warner Planning

Option I3a: Establish a South Warwickshire CIL (or emerging new Infrastructure Levy) to support the delivery of the Plan

selected

Option I3b: Each District Council to produce its own Levy

selected

Form ID: 81254

Respondent: Bluecrest Land

Agent: Warner Planning

Q-I5: Please add any comments you wish to make about infrastructure, viability and deliverability

Q-I3 Each District Council should produce its own Levy, to ensure that it can produce a bespoke offer which suits its needs and would not result in hindering development if prepared jointly.

Form ID: 81256

Respondent: Bluecrest Land

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

Q-S3.2 In response to the question, the most suitable answer is a hybrid between the first two options. In line with the Framework brownfield land should be prioritised and the preference should be that brownfield land which accords with the growth strategy or is sustainably located is the first choice. However, where this is not possible but there is still need for development and existing built form should be utilised, this should still be encouraged and allowed to be brought forward. Q-S5.2 Noting the need to deliver, it is expected that new settlements will form part of that plan, but in order to ensure a seamless delivery throughout the plan period, the strategy will need to demonstrate a variety of sources. This is because of the notably long lead in time for new settlements actually delivering new houses compared to smaller scale schemes. Q-S8.1 & S8.2 For schemes falling outside of the growth scheme, there needs to be a mechanism to allow them to be brought forward. However, the size of the individual site should not be limited by a policy and each site should be considered and assessed on its induvial merits. Q-S9 The settlement boundaries should be reviewed and revised as part of the Local Plan Part 1, to provide an up to date position for which the plan can be based and enable a more accurate implementation of the Part 2 which could then seek to make further revisions or tweaks to the boundaries at a later stage. Looking at this element as a whole though, it would provide a standardised position across the district rather than the authority lead differences in interpretation of boundary designation.

Form ID: 81257

Respondent: Bluecrest Land

Agent: Warner Planning

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Nothing chosen

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

Q-S4.1 Settlements such as Long Marston should still form part of the growth strategy to allow them to development and continue to support the existing and future occupiers as demand for services and facilities changes over time.

Form ID: 81261

Respondent: Bluecrest Land

Agent: Warner Planning

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 81263

Respondent: Bluecrest Land

Agent: Warner Planning

Q-H2-1: What is the best way to significantly increase the supply of affordable housing across South Warwickshire?

No answer given

Option H2-2a: A single South Warwickshire wide affordable housing requirement

selected

Option H2-2b: Separate affordable housing requirements for Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick Districts

selected

Option H2-2c: A more localised approach with separate affordable housing requirements for different localities across South Warwickshire

selected

Q-H2-3: How should South Warwickshire best address the specialist needs for older people?

No answer given

Form ID: 81264

Respondent: Bluecrest Land

Agent: Warner Planning

Option H6a: Identify a range of specific sites in sustainable locations of up to 15 pitches/plots in size to be developed only for Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes.

selected

Option H6b: Require large developments of over 500 homes to provide a proportion of Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes on the edge of the overall site.

selected

Option H6c: Rely on a case-by-case approach whereby planning applications for Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes will be assessed against a range of criteria to determine their suitability.

selected

Q-H7: Please add any comments you wish to make about delivering homes in South Warwickshire

Q-H2.2 In order to ensure that the affordable housing policy meets the requirements of each local authority and settlement, we would suggest option HS-2c which would enable a tailored approach lead by demand within each specific area.

Form ID: 81265

Respondent: Bluecrest Land

Agent: Warner Planning

Option D2a: Develop a South Warwickshire Design Guide

selected

Option D2b: Develop design guides and/or design codes for specific places (e.g. existing settlements or groups of settlements, or an 'area' in the case of a new settlement) where the spatial strategy identifies significant change.

selected

Option D2c: Develop design guides/codes for strategic development sites/locations.

selected

Option D2d: None of these

selected

Form ID: 81266

Respondent: Bluecrest Land

Agent: Warner Planning

Q-D5: Should we continue with the approach to include a high-level strategic policy within the Part 1 plan and to utilise heritage assessments to inform the growth strategy, and delay detailed policies to Part 2?

Nothing chosen

Q-D6: Please add any comments you wish to make about a well-designed and beautiful South Warwickshire

Q-D2 Producing a district wide Design Guide would be the preferred option to provide clear indication on the thought process and design ideologies to be implemented. This document should steer clear of providing specific details which should be brought out as part of any development rather than being dictated.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.