Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Cubbington Parish Council search

Form ID: 73670

Respondent: Cubbington Parish Council

Q-V3.1: Do you agree that the Vision and Strategic Objectives are appropriate?

Q-V3.2: If no, please indicate why

Whilst the key principles are sound there is no mention of prioritising developments that actually also ensure the protection of the most vulnerable green belt land between conurbations to both prevent urban sprawl and the loss of community identities. A recognition that major infrastructure schemes currently in progress ie. HS2 should also not lead to the redefinition of green space boundaries. Links to current reviews 'MasterPlan' focusing on South Coventry. On behalf Cubbington Parish Council

Form ID: 73672

Respondent: Cubbington Parish Council

Option I3a: Establish a South Warwickshire CIL (or emerging new Infrastructure Levy) to support the delivery of the Plan

selected

Option I3b: Each District Council to produce its own Levy

selected

Form ID: 73673

Respondent: Cubbington Parish Council

Option S1a: Identify Strategic Green and Blue Corridors in advance of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy being produced

selected

Option S1b: Do not identify Green and Blue Corridors within the South Warwickshire Local Plan, and instead rely on the production of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy

selected

Form ID: 73674

Respondent: Cubbington Parish Council

Q-S3.1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Urban Capacity Study

Strongly support the development of brownfield sites over green belt. Cubbington Neighbourhood Plan survey results • 99% wanted open spaces preserved. and a significant majority wanted to protect existing nature, environment and open land, and landscape views. With potential pressures ie. in-fill post HS2 between Cubbington and new railway line, there is need to protect the natural environment and protect what is left of the green belt buffer and landscape views. Brownfield development should also reduce traffic, noise and air pollution when situated next to amenities, schools, etc. On behalf Cubbington Parish Council

Form ID: 73675

Respondent: Cubbington Parish Council

Option S3.2a: Prioritise brownfield development only when it corresponds with the identified growth strategy, or if it can be proven that the development is in a sustainable location or would increase the sustainability of the area.

selected

Option S3.2b: Prioritise development on brownfield land, incorporating existing buildings into development proposals wherever possible, irrespective of its location

selected

Option S3.2c: None of these

selected

Form ID: 73676

Respondent: Cubbington Parish Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

No answer given

Form ID: 73677

Respondent: Cubbington Parish Council

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

No answer given

Form ID: 73678

Respondent: Cubbington Parish Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

Major new settlements should not be in green belt and definitely focused on long term sustainability (infrastructure, cleaner transport- trains, local employment). This strategy can also protect the green belt between North Leamington and Coventry, comply with the majority of people's view on green belt protection and avoid overburdening existing communities and services if a policy growth villages expansion or dispersed developments were encouraged. On behalf of Cubbington Parish Council

Form ID: 73679

Respondent: Cubbington Parish Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Appropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Neutral

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Neutral

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

Form ID: 73827

Respondent: Cubbington Parish Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Appropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.