No

Representation ID: 85974

Received: 10/01/2025

Respondent: Graham Ball

With a sustainable land supply, continual new settlements are not sustainable, therefore it should not happen. Moreover, the fertility rate in the UK is less than 2 therefore there is no need for new development in the UK.

No

Representation ID: 85984

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Miss Rebecca England

There has been too much development around Leamington, other locations should be explored instead

Yes

Representation ID: 85990

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sian Corrie

I support the concept of new settlements, the allow for infrastructure to be considered at the planning stage and do not damage smaller existing settlements.

Yes

Representation ID: 85993

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sian Corrie

I support the concept of new settlements, the allow for infrastructure to be considered at the planning stage and do not damage smaller existing settlements.

Yes

Representation ID: 86116

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Thomas Hoare

The area is perfect ,for developing , it's away from the over developed heathcote estate as Nd Europa way developments ,

No

Representation ID: 86155

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Andy Smith

This represents continued urban sprawl south of Leamington.

Yes

Representation ID: 86775

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr russell gillott

sensible expansion of what's there already

Yes

Representation ID: 86833

Received: 30/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Larkin

The infrastructure is already largely in place to support this.

Yes

Representation ID: 87046

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Judith Corless

Good transport links

Yes

Representation ID: 87211

Received: 06/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoffrey Morris

– Protects the historic nature of Warwick, Leamington, Stratford and Kenilworth.
– Offers proximity to existing large retail site and rail transport hub
– Delivers opportunity to meet differing housing needs as part of a wider community.
– Likely to offer a broader range of housing including the provision of affordable housing for different life stage groups compared to small and medium scale urban development.
– Opportunity to deliver housing alongside employment opportunities.
– Allows for schooling medical and retail to develop alongside the emerging community.

No

Representation ID: 87367

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

This site does not afford any sustainable transport links, unless a new railway station is built.

No

Representation ID: 87545

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Michaelina Jakala

I absolutely do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure. The roads cannot handle the traffic, the water mains constantly burst, the schools are oversubscribed, the GPs are in desperate need of updating and cannot handle the current number. Lack of other services, etc. No I will never support.

Yes

Representation ID: 87552

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

Suitable site - new settlement gives the opportunity of building all the infrastructure needed for a 10 minute neighbourhood

Yes

Representation ID: 87633

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James Cassidy

This area is more suitable as there are good transport links and connectivity to Leamington, Warwick and Coventry providing good facilities to support additional housing and employment opportunities. This would also be a natural expansion of the urban area which would have less impact on the openness of the green belt than developing isolated locations in the green belt.

Yes

Representation ID: 87637

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Cassidy

This area is more suitable as there are good transport links and connectivity to Leamington, Warwick and Coventry providing good facilities to support additional housing and employment opportunities. This would also be a natural expansion of the urban area which would have less impact on the openness of the green belt than developing isolated locations in the green belt.

Yes

Representation ID: 87791

Received: 11/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Katy Grant

This area is more suitable due to previous developments and infrastructure in the area.

Yes

Representation ID: 87894

Received: 12/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Tracy Pullee

There has been a significant amount of infrastructure already been built to support this growing community such as new schools, doctors surgeries, roads as well as a good range of transports links into Leamington. It also fits the 20 minute town plan with many major employers in the area as well as a large business park which increases the need for houses for the staff.

Yes

Representation ID: 87912

Received: 12/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Adam Ellerington

The site is close to established infrastructure in nearby settlements and does not impact the character of existing settlements.

No

Representation ID: 87967

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Hill

Map is outdated, a 250 acre Solar Farm is currently being built at Chesterton Fields Farm, (CV33 9JY) which will remove 1/4 of this land as it will be covered in solar panels by September 25.

We already experience issues with our water supply failing since 75 additional houses were built in Bishops Tachbrook without the supply having an upgrade. We also regularly have sewage overflowing in the village due to the existing infrastructure not coping.

The last 20 x years development and future plans are turning this area into a place where we don't want to live anymore.

Yes

Representation ID: 88058

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs vivien bryer

Better to use non- greenbelt land where possible.

Yes

Representation ID: 88128

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anne Parry

This option provides a natural expansion to Leamingtin Spa and evidence shows it has no significant impacts on landscape character.

Yes

Representation ID: 88528

Received: 16/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs vivien bryer

Seems to have a lot of advantages as long as they can get the infrastructure built quickly.

Yes

Representation ID: 88548

Received: 16/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

Yes, again provided adequate infrastructue is provided to coincide with the occupation of the initial part of the development, including adequate transport facilities. Transport faciities will be very important here and a good safe cycle route to Whitnash and Leamington areas.

Other

Representation ID: 88613

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

In part yes for smaller enterprises but would not want to see all developed. Appropriate planning needs to be exercised for housing and small enterprises.

Yes

Representation ID: 88810

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Abbie Daw

More suited to more houses compared to a village
Already has infrastructure suited to higher volumes of traffic and has good connections to M40 & A46

Yes

Representation ID: 89086

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sara Bird

As this land is very close to Whitnash and therefore can benefit from the facilities and infrastructure of very nearby Warwick/Leamington Spa this makes the most sense as a potential new development site although only if all brownfield and SG sites are already exhausted.

Yes

Representation ID: 89091

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Alison Walker

Good access to road network with planned new access to Motorway. Leamington Station has some level of capacity increase which other proposed sites adjacent to stations do not have

No

Representation ID: 89119

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Julie Hudson

Flood risk seems to be significant here.

No

Representation ID: 89282

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Boryana Mladenova

Too many houses already built. It is just the right thing to do. Traffic, no school, ni, childcare, no clinics.

Yes

Representation ID: 89363

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Fowler

I agree with this settlement

Good for nearby transport links and infrastructure.