No

Representation ID: 86031

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Nick Coleman

The eastern part of this areacovers a National Monument as well as extending to a flood plain. It would be wrong and irresponsible to further develop this land.

Yes

Representation ID: 86115

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Thomas Hoare

East Whitnash is under developed , when the new road being built soon is constructed beside champion school that side of Whitnash will have the infrastructure in place ,including Asda super market to integrate new homes , having lived in east Whitnash 54 years I feel well placed with foresight to understand the needs of east whitnash
my observation is that a new road straight through to the foss way , would provide the area with access to the M40 , also a local rail station on the fosse way would compliment any development ,

Yes

Representation ID: 86197

Received: 15/01/2025

Respondent: Professor Paul Bywaters

.

Other

Representation ID: 86266

Received: 18/01/2025

Respondent: Ms Ruth Buckley

The existing long-contested plans for land close to St Freemund are totally unsatisfactory. If building is to take place in that area the access and other contested aspects of the existing plans need to be totally changed so that they are acceptable to all. It seems as so often these plans have been driven by the developers, and this practice must be stopped in order that we have appropriate developments rather than developments that are most profitable to those who will benefit most financially.

Yes

Representation ID: 86501

Received: 27/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs C Dempster

Spread out the development

Yes

Representation ID: 86558

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Reduces travel time and pollution by keeping development to the borders of already developed areas.

Yes

Representation ID: 87253

Received: 07/02/2025

Respondent: Stockton Parish Council

Na

No

Representation ID: 87345

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

This site is not sustainable, being dislocated from nearby settlements. Unless new settlement X2 comes forward, this site is effectively a strip development along a busy road, which would not be conducive to creating a community.

Yes

Representation ID: 87499

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

Land that is not on the green belt and suitable for building houses

No

Representation ID: 87526

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Michaelina Jakala

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 87992

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

not greenbelt

Yes

Representation ID: 88072

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs vivien bryer

Not in greenbelt

Yes

Representation ID: 88138

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anne Parry

No Objection.

No

Representation ID: 88171

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rozanne Harris

Thats so much green belt land to loose. Its so sad. Also similar to SG9 & 10, Although SG11 benefits from being close to the main road network it is already a nightmare to travel into Leamington this way. This has only become more difficult with the ongoing new build locations on the south of Leam. Its a no go driving area at peak times.

No

Representation ID: 88243

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

No at this point in time. Greenfield need to provide some open spaces and this is not a logical given SG09 & 10 which i do agree with.

No

Representation ID: 88354

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Barrie Hayles

Harbury Lane west of The Fosse Way is a fairly narrow and winding road, already carrying busy traffic through the day and heavy traffic at peak time. Large scale development along this route will add more to this problem. Residents including children going to and from school will need cars for all travel owing to its isolated situation on an unlit narrow road carrying fast traffic with no footpath.

Yes

Representation ID: 88626

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jerry Corless

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 88862

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Stuart Sanderson

Building on floodplains presents significant risks. Floods can endanger lives, damage properties, and require costly flood defenses. Climate change is increasing flood risks, and developing flood-prone areas only exacerbates these issues.
SG11 floodplains already struggle with drainage and water management. Without comprehensive flood defense systems, the housing estate will be at high-risk of regular flooding, endangering residents and putting local emergency services under strain. The local infrastructure – roads, schools, healthcare facilities – is likely not equipped to handle the demands of a large housing estate. The local area will face traffic congestion, overcrowded-schools, and a strain on healthcare services.

Yes

Representation ID: 89521

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Emily Carleton

Non green belt so go ahead and build those houses!

No

Representation ID: 89669

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Helen Hawley

The land from the Fosse way to Chesterton village is of historic importance and is protected by historic England.
Chesterton Windmill is a historic landmark!

No

Representation ID: 90018

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Matthew Burns

I oppose this site on the grounds that it would endanger grade listed buildings, Chesterton Windmill and Chesterton Roman settlement

Yes

Representation ID: 90390

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Jayne Jones

having lived in this area, and witnessed growth, infrastructure in plan to support further expansion

Yes

Representation ID: 90700

Received: 04/02/2025

Respondent: Mr george Turrall

I believe we should pause consultations on future housing developments to assess the current pressures on our healthcare and school services. Warwick Hospital has declared a critical incident due to overwhelming demand and bed shortages, which risks patient safety and lowers living standards. Before approving new housing, we must ensure adequate medical and educational facilities are in place to support the growing population. If these resources are insufficient, development should be postponed. I urge our local MP to advocate for urgent funding from the Health and Education secretaries.

No

Representation ID: 90945

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Halfpenny

There have already been accidents around this area with the increase of pedestrian and vehicle traffic. More housing would create even more accidents and victims this was not managed correctly the first time before any intervention from outside people. This and SG10 would cause massive traffic issues in a low vehicle consumption area. It would be highly dangerous and there would be no distinction for the villages

No

Representation ID: 91012

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Do not agree. With the proposal of SG10 and further possible expansion of that region believe the SG11 should not be developed. Important to preserve some greenbelt for recreational and walkers alike.

No

Representation ID: 91431

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

The proposal will impact the following Local Wildlife Sites: River Avon and tributaries LWS

Yes

Representation ID: 91494

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Beth Palmer

Close to readily accessible transport links and infrastructure

Yes

Representation ID: 91933

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James OShea

This is a suitable and sustainable location which has the relevant infrastructure to work with

No

Representation ID: 92298

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James Wilkinson

Inappropriate as lack of facilities and loss of countryside

No

Representation ID: 92305

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

The part of SG11 near Whitnash is appropriate but the extension to the Southwest crossing the Fosse is not, as it is a historic site (Roman Fort and Windmill).