No

Representation ID: 86020

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Pashley

The proposed location covers green belt land, so I consider this location inappropriate for development.

No

Representation ID: 86184

Received: 14/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Freeman

Poor infratstructure as shown with the small Union View development and the impact on existing residents. How can you justify the loss of green belt land ????? It really a beautiful area of countryside enjoyed by many walkers that you want to turn into a business park ! Really dissapointing and short sited.

Grounds for Objection
- Violation of Green Belt Protections
- Environmental and Legal Non-Compliance
- Loss of Public Green Space and Community Well-Being
- Loss of Farmland and National Food Security Risks

Conclusion
If this project is approved, Warwickshire will suffer irreparable damage, including:
•Permanent loss of protected Green Belt land.
•Severe environmental destruction and biodiversity loss.
•Increased flood risks due to inadequate drainage systems.
•Overwhelming traffic congestion and public safety concerns.
•Diminished community well-being and destruction of public green spaces.

Yes

Representation ID: 86195

Received: 15/01/2025

Respondent: Professor Paul Bywaters

.

Yes

Representation ID: 86264

Received: 18/01/2025

Respondent: Ms Ruth Buckley

Yes, provided green belt land is not used, and also that adequate services are in place.

No

Representation ID: 86420

Received: 24/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Daphne Tilley

If this site along with site B1 was developed there would be continued urban sprawl covering Leamington , Warwick and Hatton. This is unacceptable and negates the principle of having a Green Belt.

No

Representation ID: 86445

Received: 25/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carole Johnson

This development is at an already busy junction which will be a major cause for concern spending so close to the station.

Yes

Representation ID: 86554

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Reduces travel time and pollution by keeping development to the borders of already developed areas.

No

Representation ID: 87000

Received: 02/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

It is not clear what this space is allocated for. When considered in relations to the desired housing development in Hatton, it represents a significant expansion in this green space area, with a great deal of pressure on local communities,

No

Representation ID: 87340

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

Need to maintain separation between Hatton and Warwick

Yes

Representation ID: 87495

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

No

Representation ID: 87521

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Michaelina Jakala

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure.

No

Representation ID: 87522

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Michaelina Jakala

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure.

No

Representation ID: 87676

Received: 10/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jo Lancashire

The location is not supported sufficiently by transport links, forcing more traffic through a small town who drives attention from their quaint appeal, traffic flow through Warwick is congested even at present. The A46, specifically the Long Bridge roundabout with its recent upgrades does not support the level of traffic entering it at present, this site will drive even more. It is a semi-rural location without transport links or walk-able amenities. Could we consider a report of the former IBM Site, it's attraction to businesses and how fast it let, if at all before weight is given to this area?

No

Representation ID: 87827

Received: 11/02/2025

Respondent: Mr David Hotten

There are no exceptional circumstances to warrant development in the green belt as there are sufficient strategic growth locations outside of the green belt.

No

Representation ID: 87897

Received: 07/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Wassall

I am objecting to the inclusion of Housing Developments B1 and SG07 in the South Warwickshire Local Plan due to several concerns. The developments threaten productive arable farming land and the Green Belt, which should be protected for future food security. There is insufficient infrastructure to support the proposed 8,000 to 10,000 houses, which would strain local services like healthcare and schools. Traffic congestion would worsen significantly, and public services are already inadequate. Additionally, the environmental impact on local wildlife and the rural character of the area would be detrimental.

No

Representation ID: 87932

Received: 12/02/2025

Respondent: mr mark betker

Objection to the SG07 site:
SG07 is a clear breach into the Green Belt and Green Belt Planning Guidelines.
There is insufficient infrastructure to support such a large development.
Existing roads and traffic infrastructure will not be capable of supporting the plan.
Detrimental impact upon the A46 Stanks Island junction and traffic flow along the A46 and flow in and out of Warwick on the A4177.
Danger to cyclists, pedestrians and road users due to increased traffic.
Loss of agricultural farmland, wildlife and habitat, plus loss of historic hedgerows and trees.
Detrimental effect upon tourism into the area.

Yes

Representation ID: 87949

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Waterworth

I whole heartedly object to proposed development at Hatton. In no way is thexarea prepared for further population.
The roads around the proposed site are chaos. Healthcare is already over whelmed. Takes for ever to see a GP and frequent experience of 10hour plus for A&E. Does not comply with Warwick district strategic objectives. Why are we denying are beautiful green belt from future generations for little benefit to local economy. No evidence of local demand. Ease of commuting to London can not be a justication. Please do not destroy our Warwickshire, a precious rural county.

No

Representation ID: 87984

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

In greenbelt

No

Representation ID: 87986

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Quantrill

No. This is greenbelt I believe.

No

Representation ID: 88067

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Norman Stephens

This area has for two plus years since a lot of disturbance, with huge traffic issues. Adding industrial noise and traffic where their is a huge estate next to it, at an elevated level, seems non-sensical compared to other identified SG areas with few people nearby and better road network.

I would however support a solar farm being built on the land, as this is low noise, low traffic even during construction, and a haven for wildlife and I would encourage my neighbours to do the same.

Yes

Representation ID: 88167

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rozanne Harris

SG07 is either already in or directly adjacent to a highly populated area. The road infrastructure is already in place

No

Representation ID: 88198

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Michael Hinett

Justification: 1. Environment: loss of green belt; loss of habitat; loss of green space. 2. Infrastructure: Birmingham Road already at capacity and could not cope with considerable increase in traffic. 3. Urban sprawl: combined with B1, feels like Warwick would spill over and into Hatton. 4. Loss of agricultural land and farming livelihoods. 5. Hatton & Budbrooke would cease to be 'a great place to live'

Yes

Representation ID: 88232

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Given its location and excellent infrastructure access - ideal for business park

Yes

Representation ID: 88237

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Given its ideal location for transport connections for north and south of UK, this is an ideal business park.

No

Representation ID: 88313

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Mark Smith

The development risks conurbating Warwick with Hatton loosing some of the identity of both locales and the loss of green belt land.

No

Representation ID: 88588

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Miss Hollie Hammond

I wish to object to the proposed housing sites in Budbrooke Ward. Having lived in Hatton since 2001 and now in Hampton Magna, I am concerned about the destruction of open landscapes and farmland. I have lifelong injuries that make road safety essential, and I want to protect Budbrooke from increased traffic. The green belt is vital for our well-being and cultural heritage. Additionally, with Warwick Hospital facing overcapacity issues, more housing will exacerbate traffic and pollution, putting lives at risk. I would appreciate your help in voicing my concerns.

Other

Representation ID: 88622

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jerry Corless

Linkage to the national road network, currently limited employment opportunities.

No

Representation ID: 88748

Received: 02/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Price

Inappropriate development of the Green Belt surrounding Hatton Park would negatively impact the area, diminishing its character. As a resident for 20 years, I have valued the natural environment for both personal and family enjoyment, especially during lockdown. Local infrastructure cannot handle increased traffic, evidenced by existing jams on Birmingham Road and A46. Additionally, there are insufficient schools, doctors, and shops to support a population surge. Increased housing would introduce noise and pollution, compromising health and enjoyment of the countryside, while also leading to loss of privacy for residents.

No

Representation ID: 89033

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sara Bird

I believe the A46 should be honoured as a ring round to contain urban sprawl, this development in a smaller capacity would be acceptable but otherwise will start to erode the green belt protection around Warwick.

No

Representation ID: 89334

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Martin

I do not feel that more building is needed in this area, specifically the proposal of turning Wedgnock Farm into a massive industrial estate (SG07). Traffic is already problematic in the areas around the Birmingham Road - the area becomes gridlocked when issues arise on the M40/A46 and Warwick and surrounding villages become a rat run for vehicles. Building on greenbelt should be avoided as there is plenty of other land available that is more suitable and closer to roads more able to cope with the extra traffic.