No

Representation ID: 85946

Received: 10/01/2025

Respondent: Averil Stewart

Using farmland at Stoneleigh should not be the first port of call. the surrounding roads are not fit for high traffic, do not have the same services and the use of this land effectively joins both Stoneleigh and Kenilworth to make a coventry conubation with is detrimetal to the wildlife of the area also

No

Representation ID: 86016

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Pashley

The proposed location covers green belt land, so I consider this location inappropriate for development.

Yes

Representation ID: 86044

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

No

Representation ID: 86269

Received: 18/01/2025

Respondent: Ms Ruth Buckley

There are plenty of half used properties already in the Stoneleigh Park complex. These should be used rather than new employment. Far too much land in that area has already been decimated by the HS2 work.

Yes

Representation ID: 86595

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Darrell Muffitt

Appears to be a reasonable extension of established use

No

Representation ID: 86725

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Miss Claire Whitehouse

Stoneleigh Park should be retained as an agricultural park, supporting the businesses that are located there. Investment should be encouraged to generate more employment and opportunities. Many exhibitions take place there so would lose huge revenue and job loss if it was forced to close.

No

Representation ID: 86809

Received: 30/01/2025

Respondent: Mr GERALD KELLY

Consider travel and the effect on rural environment

No

Representation ID: 86967

Received: 01/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carys Bains

Having moved to the area recently, one of the biggest benefits is the fact that it is quiet, calm and we’re surrounded by nature. The current doctors schools and amenities do not have the capacity to take on the amount of houses which have been provided, and there are no plans to extend these. Additionally more houses (including inevitable social housing) will bring the value down of the existing houses in the local area and will likely push others out.

No

Representation ID: 86992

Received: 02/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

What this space is used for is not described fully enough. How does this development relate to SG01 which is a huge development.

Yes

Representation ID: 87032

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Judith Corless

yes, good for smaller businesses, offices, manufacturing and some housing. Road links there have improved over the last few years

Yes

Representation ID: 87217

Received: 06/02/2025

Respondent: Arina Cirstea

Some areas (Stoneleigh Park) already used and in need in of further development.

No

Representation ID: 87222

Received: 06/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Chris Rusbridge

This area does not make sense, wrapped around HS2 and adjacent to the very noisy A46. Areas further away from these noise polluting corridors would make more sense.

Yes

Representation ID: 87333

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

Already a developed area, brownfield opportunity

Yes

Representation ID: 87490

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 87491

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

No

Representation ID: 87515

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Michaelina Jakala

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure.

No

Representation ID: 87517

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Michaelina Jakala

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 87683

Received: 10/02/2025

Respondent: Mr justin kerridge

yes

No

Representation ID: 87822

Received: 11/02/2025

Respondent: Mr David Hotten

There are no exceptional circumstances to warrant development in the green belt as there are sufficient strategic growth locations outside of the green belt.

No

Representation ID: 87975

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

This is within the greenbelt.

No

Representation ID: 87976

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Quantrill

This is greenbelt land I believe.

No

Representation ID: 88064

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jeanette Ray

This looks like green belt land , which we are loosing dramatically.
Kenilworth doesn’t have the infrastructure to cope with more houses and people.
Roads are not adequate to cope with more traffic this will produce.

No

Representation ID: 88162

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rozanne Harris

There isnt the road infrastructure in place. Ok HS2 is operating there but they use their own haul road for material transport.

Yes

Representation ID: 88227

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Absolutely 100%. Regeneration of land (brownfield) in an area in need of. To market and bring new businesses and housing. Having lived in Warwickshire all my life it has disappointed me how the City of Coventry has declined over the years when it was once a vibrant hub. It is time to regenerate Coventry over the next 25 years and make it a place to go - socially, to live and to work.

Yes

Representation ID: 88229

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Given it being an effective brownfield site and not utilised to its full this is a natural location for redevelopment of business commerce and housing.

Yes

Representation ID: 88615

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jerry Corless

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 88657

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Middleton

The Stoneleigh Park (NAC) seems a sound location for employment growth as it already has various employment on site and it is close to major residential areas.

Yes

Representation ID: 88679

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Crispin Passmore

More local employment opportunities and perhaps housing too

No

Representation ID: 88782

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Roopa Lentini

Ruin rural landscape and cause bottlenecks to infrastructure

No

Representation ID: 88785

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Dean Lentini

Building new houses in north Leamington is not only going to cause more traffic than we already have and the infrastructure won’t handle it. But more disappointingly it will ruin the countryside we have and that up market feel. Look at Warwick gates development it’s ruined and the traffic is colossal and the place looks like a tip. Leamington has been ruined enough without you building more trash in the best part of leamington.