Yes

Representation ID: 97349

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Guy Morris

Brownfield land should always be prioritised for development over greenbelt. It's astonishing that it even needs to be stated. Less environmental impact and protects the beauty of Warwickshire, which is a major draw

Other

Representation ID: 97375

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Godwin Developments

Godwin Development acknowledge the suggested approach in Draft Policy Direction 9 however it is imperative that the plan takes a holistic approach and should not rule utilising other sources of land which are considered to be in sustainable locations.

In this regard, it is noted that the capacity to utilise brownfield land across both districts is limited and therefore other sources of land will be utilised.

Yes

Representation ID: 97560

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Brenda Stewart

no comment

Yes

Representation ID: 97675

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Susan Leonard

Brownfield sites have already been built upon and their use for the above purposes makes sense. We need to keep land that can grow food available for food production.

Yes

Representation ID: 97721

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Melanie Elkington

On the whole I agree ... but if it can be used for environmental or Leisure then it can be used for housing .

Yes

Representation ID: 97802

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

... if correctly implemented is acceptable.

Other

Representation ID: 97875

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Hibbert

Brownfield land should always be used over greenbelt land for development as stated in the policy. We must protect against urban sprawl and save our open spaces.

Yes

Representation ID: 97895

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Tracey Hasnaoui

yes, greenbelt land should be protected at all costs and should only be used in exceptional circumstances

Yes

Representation ID: 97942

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Charlotte Careless

Brown land should always be used first before green belt land as green belt is there to protect the countryside.

Yes

Representation ID: 97995

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Bowater

Brownfiled sites should be considered first for development as that land would otherwise be left to deteriorate. Using these sites will help to protect the greenbelt from urban sprawl.

Yes

Representation ID: 98296

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Barry Elkington

The re-use of previously developed sites should be the top priority. Utilising any Brownfield Land for development will help minimise the loss of green / agricultural land elsewhere, even if the Brownfield areas may be less sustainable than those in greenfield sites.

Yes

Representation ID: 98368

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Daine Davis

n/a

No

Representation ID: 98447

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Holly Farm Business Park

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

It is clear from Figure 5 of the consultation document that the Jaguar Land Rover site at Fen End falls within Spatial Priority Area 1 within adjoining land at the former Airfield defined as Spatial Priority 2. In this context, the ‘sifting out’ of the opportunities at Holly Farm Business Park that fall within the confines on the former airfield at RAF Honiley is not justified. The decision should be reversed.

An historic map showing the extent of the former RAF Honiley is attached.

Yes

Representation ID: 98482

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Philip Sykes

Agreed.

Yes

Representation ID: 98501

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Wright

Brownfield sites provide enough space for all additional housing requirements and must be used.

Yes

Representation ID: 98562

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Robert Macvie

Brownfield land should always be considered first for development rather than using precious farmland. Urban sprawl in rural areas is unsightly and means the loss of open landscape forever.

Other

Representation ID: 98585

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Alice Hibbert

Brownfield Land should always be used for development over green belt land as set out in the policy for the importance of protecting from urban sprawl and the loss of open landscape.

Yes

Representation ID: 98596

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Diana TIPTON

I would like to see empty / derelict / unprofitable pubs and shops be reused as housing in Warwick Town Centre, rather than digging up yet more green fields for new housing. It would rejuvenate the town and reduce the need for cars. It should be much easier to change the use of a commercial property to residential to reflect changing consumer demand. We need houses, not so many physical shops.

Yes

Representation ID: 98801

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Roger Shimmin

The use of brownfield sites must be exhaustively discussed and adopted before any consideration on green belt

Yes

Representation ID: 98816

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Old Milverton and Blackdown Parish Council

Agree

Other

Representation ID: 98903

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Susan Ducker

Only when there is adequate infrastructure such as good roads and schools etc

Yes

Representation ID: 99052

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lynda McCarthy

using land already lost towoodlands and wildlife is much more acceptable than ripping up more green land

Yes

Representation ID: 99063

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Kevan Russell

I agree.

Yes

Representation ID: 99095

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Stephen Wyatt

WDC must demonstrate that all brown field sites are being actively pursued.

Yes

Representation ID: 99309

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr James Kennedy

This local plan needs to very strongly promote use of urban brownfield land, because it preserves green field land for agricultural and leisure purposes, as well as adhering to 20 minute neighbourhood principles as brownfields are almost always close to local amenities.

Yes

Representation ID: 99310

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

The policy confirms that where available brownfield land is located outside of urban areas, decisions on its use will have reference to the sustainability of the location, with regard to the Spatial Growth Strategy priority areas 1-3; and/or whether its use would increase the sustainability of the area as part of a large-scale development such as a new settlement.

New Settlement A1, including site 758, demonstrates the acknowledgement of the brownfield status of the site and the sustainability of its location, including the use of the site as part of a larger scale development. Our client supports this policy.

Yes

Representation ID: 99461

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Diane Wilson

Keep away from green belt, farm land and all green spaces.

Yes

Representation ID: 99533

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steven Murray

Brownfield sites should be used instead of consideration of green belt which would endanger the open countryside.

Yes

Representation ID: 99601

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Loades

There are plenty of brownfield sites in North/South Wellesbourne, these should be considered before developing on Green Belt land.

Yes

Representation ID: 99602

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jean Bull

This would be more appropriate than using green belt land