No

Representation ID: 101005

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mac Mic Group

Agent: Marrons

The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.

Yes

Representation ID: 101049

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr guy evans

n/a

No

Representation ID: 101135

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land Management Limited

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs. The needs of Southam must be considered, the SWCs should not enforce densities which would not deliver the homes to meet the identified need, as this may impact developer viability.

Other

Representation ID: 101270

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Bart Slob

I partially agree with Draft Policy Direction 8 but have concerns about its implementation. The policy promotes higher density development but lacks clear guidance on where it is appropriate. Density should respect local character and avoid overdevelopment, particularly in areas with limited infrastructure. Increased density must be matched by improvements in schools, healthcare, and transport to prevent further strain on services. The policy should guarantee infrastructure expansion before high-density development is approved. A balanced approach is needed, ensuring densification is sustainable, context-sensitive, and supported by essential infrastructure to maintain quality of life for residents.

No

Representation ID: 101309

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.

Yes

Representation ID: 101429

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bellway Strategic Land / Ashberry Strategic Land

Agent: Marrons

The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.

Furthermore, the needs of the Main Service Centres and Local Service Villages must be considered, the SWC’s should not enforce densities which would not deliver the homes to meet the identified need, as this may impact developer viability.

Yes

Representation ID: 101458

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Zoe Leventhal

Higher density housing is appropriate in built up areas to avoid the need to release important green belt land and encroach further on nature and biodiversity. This also creates closer communities and better sustainable development

No

Representation ID: 101525

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Vincent Rollason

This development is not good for the area

Other

Representation ID: 101571

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Alderley Holdings Trust

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.

Yes

Representation ID: 101824

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Clive Henderson

The proposal looks reasonable to me

Yes

Representation ID: 101917

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Anne Page

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 101957

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

The NPPF emphasises the importance of making efficient use of land (Paragraph 124), but also recognizes the need for a range of housing densities to reflect local market conditions and community needs. While higher densities help meet housing demand, lower-density developments must also be accommodated to provide choice, support well-being and meet the needs of those requiring larger gardens or more space from neighbours. A balanced approach ensures sustainable development, aligns with local character (Paragraph 125) and delivers diverse housing options for all residents.

No

Representation ID: 102007

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Joseph Dimambro-Denson

We need to aim for a higher minimum level of densification to avoid sprawl and enable creation of parks and greenspaces. I'm talking about gentle density levels that will also encourage active travel, but not be offputting.

Other

Representation ID: 102097

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Sarah Brooke-Taylor

Increased density can put a significant strain on existing infrastructure, such as roads, public transport, and utilities. This can lead to congestion, overburdened public services, and a decline in the quality of life for residents. It can lead to increased air pollution, reduced green spaces, and changes to local microclimates. Lack of privacy and increased noise levels can negatively affect the mental and physical health of inhabitants. A Design Code is one way forward but should not be too prescriptive and be wary of generalisations.

Other

Representation ID: 102114

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited

Agent: Turley

53. IM Land do not object to the approach proposed by Draft Policy Direction 8, subject to any final policy building in flexibility for density ranges. Planning policy must support efficient use of land at appropriate density in accordance with Paragraph 129 in the NPPF.
54. The wording indicates density ranges will be agreed through a Design Code. Any Design Code should be prepared in accord with national guidance and offer a degree of flexibility and variety aligning with NPPF Paragraph 133 to allow consideration on a site-by-site basis and to ensure it remains adaptable to a changing market demands.

Other

Representation ID: 102122

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: BDW Trading Limited

Agent: Knight Frank LLP

The draft policy seeks to incorporate densities in design codes which may include areas for higher density. Flexibility in these codes is essential to prevent conflicts that might impede the growth strategy, especially for new settlements and strategic growth locations. Larger settlements may encompass varied densities, with higher densities near local centres or transport hubs and lower densities on peripheries. An overarching density strategy, for example with indicative density ranges, could allow for site-specific codes to address site specific requirements which would assist the council's development management team in assessing suitability and achievability of densities in proposed developments.

Yes

Representation ID: 102143

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Doug Wallace

N/A

Other

Representation ID: 102180

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: LRM Planning

Draft Policy Direction 26 indicates that individual design codes are proposed for site specific allocations and that these will be produced by the local planning authority and adopted after the SWLP adoption. The logic of these two approaches is that only once those design codes have been prepared would the appropriate density ranges have been determined for different locations. Given the potential extent and number of site-specific design codes required under this approach we would question whether this is an efficient and effective process.

Other

Representation ID: 102243

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land

Agent: Turley

Taylor Wimpey has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.

In respect of any overarching Design Code to be adopted by the Council, this should give a degree of flexibility to allow consideration on a site-by-site basis and to ensure it remains adaptable to a changing market and cross reference Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’.

No

Representation ID: 102321

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough

Agent: Marrons

The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.

Other

Representation ID: 102450

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hill Residential

Agent: Turley

ill Residential does not object to the approach proposed by Draft Policy Direction 8, subject to any final policy building in flexibility for density ranges, which the draft policy indicates will be agreed through Design Codes.

Any overarching Design Code to be adopted by either of the councils should give a degree of flexibility to allow consideration on a site-by-site basis and to ensure it remains adaptable to a changing market.

No

Representation ID: 102544

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Carl Barthorpe

Building and occupation density in Kenilworth is already too high, its not a suitable town for any further growth, there's already 1000 houses under construction (nearly 5000 approved within a couple of miles, e.g. South Coventry)

Yes

Representation ID: 102704

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Phoebe Withnall

Draft Policy Direction 8 takes a sensible approach by recognising the benefits of higher density while ensuring it is shaped by design codes. Increasing density, if well planned, can create walkable, vibrant neighbourhoods that reduce car dependency and support local services. However, without clear minimum density requirements, there is a risk that developments will default to low-density sprawl rather than making efficient use of land. The policy should ensure that densification does not become a token gesture and that new development actually contributes to more sustainable, well-connected places rather than just adding more housing without improving urban form.

Yes

Representation ID: 102817

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Bailey

I would encourage denser and taller housing, e.g. flats above retail.

No

Representation ID: 102980

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes

Agent: Marrons

The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.

Yes

Representation ID: 103194

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Densification should be looked at on urban brown belt and in suitable existing main cities and towns excluding Warwick and South Leamington

Other

Representation ID: 103214

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Salford Road, Bidford-on-Avon

Agent: Turley

Richborough has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.

With regard to the reference to Design Codes, it is recommended that the future policy text for Draft Policy Direction 8 should cross refer to Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’ and the supporting text. Richborough have provided more detailed comments in relation to Design Codes within their response to Draft Policy Direction 26.

Other

Representation ID: 103215

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

Richborough has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.

With regard to the reference to Design Codes, it is recommended that the future policy text for Draft Policy Direction 8 should cross refer to Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’ and the supporting text. Richborough have provided more detailed comments in relation to Design Codes within their response to Draft Policy Direction 26.

Other

Representation ID: 103217

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Lighthorne Road, Kineton

Agent: Turley

Richborough has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.

With regard to the reference to Design Codes, it is recommended that the future policy text for Draft Policy Direction 8 should cross refer to Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’ and the supporting text. Richborough have provided more detailed comments in relation to Design Codes within their response to Draft Policy Direction 26.

Other

Representation ID: 103219

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton

Agent: Turley

Richborough has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.

With regard to the reference to Design Codes, it is recommended that the future policy text for Draft Policy Direction 8 should cross refer to Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’ and the supporting text. Richborough have provided more detailed comments in relation to Design Codes within their response to Draft Policy Direction 26.