Object

Representation ID: 66970

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Elizabeth Cliffe

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 66978

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Mrs Kay Cugini

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 66986

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Mr David Ramsbottom

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 66994

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Mr David Drinkhall

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67002

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Ian Frost

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67010

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Mr Geoff Reynolds

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67018

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: John Griffiths

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67026

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Justin Richards

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67034

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Louise Kalus

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67042

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Paul Kalus

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67050

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Mr Bernard Hollis

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67058

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Mr R Komarasinha

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67066

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Caroline Komarasinha

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67074

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Matthew Drinkhall

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67082

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Oliver Lane

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67090

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Ms Helen Maclagan

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67098

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Mr and Mrs J Pennington

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67106

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Mr Peter Lamb

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67114

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Sarah Hunt

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67122

Received: 03/07/2014

Respondent: Mr Ben Orme

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The loss of Greenfield land is unsustainable. As only 8100 houses are needed over the plan period this can be met from permissions already granted together with the brown field sites identified in the plan. Greenfield sites are remote from schools, shops and other services and it has not been demonstrated that proposals for transport are going to be practicable/ effective. Much of this land (south of Warwick and Leamington in particular) is high grade agricultural which we cannot afford to lose.
The Plans Greenfield allocations are excessive and unnecessary as higher densities (using less land) will be attainable on previously developed/ brownfield land. The garden suburbs are extravagant; their low densities mean more land than what is necessary is being allocated for development.

Object

Representation ID: 67218

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Bloor Homes Midlands

Agent: Marrons Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Framework requires Plans to allocate land with least environmental/amenity value, and the evidence base would suggest that the selection of proposed allocations at
Leek Wootton has not adhered this principle. Accordingly, the Plan does not contain the most appropriate strategy for Leek Wootton when considered against the reasonable alternatives.