Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49791
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Keith Lowe
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Council's Preferred Options for the Local plan. This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It:
-Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
-Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
-Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
-Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington and Warwick, both historic towns.
-Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south ofLeamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49794
Received: 26/07/2012
Respondent: Rachel Corcoran
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan. This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists including myself.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49803
Received: 24/07/2012
Respondent: Drs Mandy Barnett & Patrick James
Number of people: 2
Building should only take place in green belt if exceptional circumstances can be justified. This has not been demonstrated in this case and alternative, non green belt sites are available south of the town and at Ford Foundry. there are also numerous smaller sites that do not appear to have been looked at
The key requirement is for affordable housing rather than market housing. In large scale housing developments affordable housing will inevitably be sqeezed and therefore are unlikely to deliver the houses the area needs.
The green belt is there to enhance the environment of existing communities. It provides an important opportunity for recreation which will be lost.
The development necessitates the LNRR which will add to green belt damage.
Scanned representation
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49809
Received: 26/07/2012
Respondent: Virginia Hastings-Teall
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
* I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
* This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
* The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
* The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
o Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
o Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
o Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
o Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
o Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
* There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
* The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
* Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49811
Received: 25/07/2012
Respondent: Paul and Lesley Eldridge
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
We object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local Plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the five purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists there, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49812
Received: 23/07/2012
Respondent: L. J. Sant Cassia
Blackdown should be viewed as a village and as such does not fall within category 1, 2 or 3. It is therefore not a village which has been identified as suitable for development. Yet a very large number of houses are proposed for the area plus community facilities and employment.
Very special circumstances have not been justified to support these proposals. Green belt is there to prevent urban sprawl and merging of settlements, but these proposals will result in coalescence in contradiction to the Coincils stated aims. There are aletrnatives to the south of Leamington. the Cheltenham appeal concluded that housing shortage and need did not amount to exceptional circumstances.
The proposed park and ride is not needed. Dualing the A452 will not help as Kenilworth Road will still be a bottleneck
the proposals would require another school to be built just after North Leam School has been rebuilt.
It appears widening of Stoneleigh Rd is propoosed, yet, this would require gardens o be requistioned.
the proposals will result in loss of high quality agricultural land.
Scanned Letter
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49816
Received: 25/07/2012
Respondent: Noel Johnson
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to your Proposed Preferred Option plans, because you could have adopted those prepared in 2009 for the Core Strategy Plan, which did not require the use of Precious Green Belt Land. These previous plans would have been much less expensive as they did not require the extravagance of a whole new infrastructure, which we do not need.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan because this land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open. The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It:
* Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
* Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
* Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
* Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
* Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49818
Received: 25/07/2012
Respondent: Laura Kite
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, dog walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
* Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
* Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
* Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
* Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
* Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49819
Received: 23/07/2012
Respondent: M. J. Lynch
Number of people: 2
Object to development in green belt north of Leamington for following reasons:
-the land is of high value as indicated by the Council's study
-it has high recreational value
-development will close the gap between the towns in the District
-NPPF requires very special circumstances for green belt development. This has not been done.
-There are alternatives to the south of Leamington which have access to infrastructure, M40, retail and employment.
-Developer profit should not be a factor in selecting sites.
-the proposals would result in more congestion and dualing the A452 will not resolve this.
-Further out of town retail should be resisted as it would undermine the independent retailers in Leamington.
Scanned representation
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49821
Received: 09/11/2012
Respondent: Fay Kite
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. My family and I make daily use of the area - walking our dog, running, taking visitors across to the Saxon Mill and we also like to cycle there.
According to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open. Accordingly, the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
* Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
* Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
* Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
* Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington which is a historic town
* Helps urban regeneration by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49824
Received: 09/11/2012
Respondent: Jean Williams
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49827
Received: 24/07/2012
Respondent: Nigel and Sue Thom
Number of people: 2
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
We object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community and we enjoy regular walks with our dog Fergal over the land affected.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It:
* Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
* Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
* Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
* Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
* Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
The proposed development will significantly affect the amenity value and the biodiversity of the area between Leamington and the A46 which is used by many local people on a regular basis. There must be a better option.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49831
Received: 24/07/2012
Respondent: Kathy Jarvis
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I strongly object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land is rich and agriculturally productive. We need this land to safeguard our country's food security.
It has great recreational value to the local community and gives Leamington its special personality. A great small town with already excellent facilities and with easy access tot eh surrounding countryside. Do not throw the baby out with the bath water!
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
* Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
* Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
* Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
* Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a
historic town)
* Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of
derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt.
These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy).
Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49834
Received: 24/07/2012
Respondent: J. Grundy
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
* Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
* Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
* Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
* Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
* Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49850
Received: 24/07/2012
Respondent: Colin Temple
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan. This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
* Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
* Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
* Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
* Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
* Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49853
Received: 23/07/2012
Respondent: Elina Byrne
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
* Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
* Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
* Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
* Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
* Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49854
Received: 02/08/2012
Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council
Following similar reasoning to development at Milverton Gardens, this location could only be developed in very special circumstances. However, the parish Council has argued that the housing numbers required over the next 10-15 years are substantially lower (5336) than the Preferred Options projection (10,800). Development could be accomodated almost entirely within existing commitments, windfall sites and urban brownfield sites.
See Attachments
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49856
Received: 23/07/2012
Respondent: Angela Jezard
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils Preferred Options for the local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers, nature lovers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework(NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of
Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land
forever. It
a. prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
b. prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
c. helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
d. helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington ( a historic town)
e. helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in
Warwick District Council's previous plan(the 2009 core strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be
used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF state that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional
circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this
land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49858
Received: 23/07/2012
Respondent: Kate England
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49864
Received: 23/07/2012
Respondent: Jonathan Wallis
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
As a resident of Northumberland Road I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
* Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
* Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
* Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
* Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
* Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49868
Received: 23/07/2012
Respondent: Glynn Davis
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community and I know that it is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers, cyclists and families.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
* Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
* Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
* Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
* Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
* Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49870
Received: 23/07/2012
Respondent: Mr Phil Wilding
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community and I know that it is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers, cyclists and families.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
* Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
* Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
* Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
* Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
* Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49875
Received: 22/07/2012
Respondent: Dr Sandra Williams
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49879
Received: 22/07/2012
Respondent: G.A. Mitchell
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan. This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north; prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth; helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment; helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town); helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49883
Received: 22/07/2012
Respondent: P.S. MITCHELL
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan. This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north; prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth; helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment; helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town); helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49886
Received: 22/07/2012
Respondent: Laura Talamini
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington historic town)
Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49890
Received: 21/07/2012
Respondent: Katie Crawford
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Leicester Lane, Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils' Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth, Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment, Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town) Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49894
Received: 21/07/2012
Respondent: Rebecca Hemingway
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land.
I object to the proposed development in Leicester Lane, Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils' Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north, rrevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth, helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment, helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town) and helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49898
Received: 21/07/2012
Respondent: Debby Hill
This land has great recreational value to the local community.
This land fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt as defined in NPPF.
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Green Belt. As such there are no exceptional circumstance to alter the Green Belt boundaries in old milverton and blackdown and allow development on this land
To whom it may concern,
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
*Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
*Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
*Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
*Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a historic town)
*Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt. These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy). Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
Please reconsider your Preferred Options.
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 49914
Received: 23/07/2012
Respondent: Dan Robbins
Exceptional circumstances for development here have not been justified. These areas are heavily used for recreation and fulfill the 5 purposes of green belt and have a positive role to play. Green belt should be wide (several miles) and should be well deined by geographical features.
There are also suitable non green belt sites available for housing(Gallows Hill, Chase Meadow) and employment (many vacant sites which must be used (eg through tax incentives) before even more land is allocated in the green belt. These sites have better access to infrastructure (eg transport) than the green belt sites. The proposed transport infrastructure for Blackdown and Milverton would be very expensive.
The proposals would damage Old Milverton (new road) and would increase traffic at the expnse of public transport. In this respoect the proposals are contrary to the Council's low carbon policies. - especially as the green belt land is eemote from the town centre and other facilities.
The Green Belt also naturally provides for recreation and green space in a natural state.
the proposals will damage biodeiversity - even if offsettig is implemented.
Scanned representation