Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 47387

Received: 02/08/2012

Respondent: MR PETER DUNNICLIFFE

Representation Summary:

Building a large number of houses in Norton Lindsey will destroy the historic character of the village with its medieval fields etc. In addition it will create more carbon emissions as it has no bus service to speak of and no safe cycle route.

Full text:

Building a large number of houses in Norton Lindsey will destroy the historic character of the village with its medieval fields etc. In addition it will create more carbon emissions as it has no bus service to speak of and no safe cycle route.

Support

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 47560

Received: 26/07/2012

Respondent: Thomas Bates & Son LTD

Agent: Andrew Martin Planning

Representation Summary:

Support for general objective to deliver high quality.
Acknowledge principles of sustainable suburbs and villages.
Willing to explore innovative ideas and create paradigm for applying overarching principles to smaller extensions which can be emulated.
Support protection and enhancement and link with natural environment as well as secure, safe and accessible places. NPPF encourages use fo design codes if not overly prescriptive. Maintains codes should concentrate on scale, density, massing, height, landscape, layout, materials and access.

Full text:

Electronic attachment

Attachments:

Support

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 47978

Received: 25/07/2012

Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement

Agent: RPS Planning & Development

Representation Summary:

Accept policy PO10.
Should only be incorporated in sites where viable to do so.
Rural housing could be compomised if it doesn't meet all criteria.
Flexibility required in these cases.
Highest figure should be target.

Full text:

Letter and representation form attached electronically.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49967

Received: 18/07/2012

Respondent: Mr Peter Hamnett

Representation Summary:

The Garden Towns and Suburbs prospectus promotes the concept of sustainable development but fails to provide any new thinking on layouts or how to accomodate large numbers of affordable housing, it provides a poor model for sensitive landscapes and boundaries with existing communities.

Full text:

Scanned letter