Object

Representation ID: 39024

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39034

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Arvad Mistry

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39044

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39054

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Ms F Muddeman

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39064

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Miss S James

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39074

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M N Reed

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39084

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs D Smith

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39094

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Jan Gledhill

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39104

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupiers

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39114

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39124

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs B Compton

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39134

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs David and Sandra Hay

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39144

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr C Browne

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39154

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs V James

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39164

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs S Muddeman

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39174

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S E James

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39184

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Loveday

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39194

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Caroline Loveday

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39204

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: H Jackson

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39214

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Ripanjit Mann

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39224

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39234

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Ms M Rose

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39244

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39254

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: A Garnett

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39264

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr A Ross

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39274

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39284

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs S S James

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39294

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Monica Howat

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39304

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Dawn Herbert

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 39314

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Laurie and Deborah Walker

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.