Object

Representation ID: 36624

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: D Smallwood

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36634

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: D Tophan

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36644

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: B Cogan

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36654

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: J R Fisher

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36664

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Jenny and Adrian Beran

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36674

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: P Payne

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36684

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Shirley T Cotterill

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36694

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Jim and Laura Henderson

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36704

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36714

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: G R Stephens

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36724

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: A J Leach

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36734

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs A Lothian

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36744

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P Bains

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36754

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36764

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs S A and K N Loggie

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36774

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Kendall

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36784

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Dr H Eden and Dr A Sharif

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36794

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: N and T Martucci

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36804

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36814

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Freeman

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36824

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Nicola Beasley

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36834

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Tony Platt and Liz McNally

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36844

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupiers

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36854

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36864

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36874

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Julie Tomlinson

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36884

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Jane and Zac Everett

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36894

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: J C Evans

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36904

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36914

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Ian Walker

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.