Object

Representation ID: 35724

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Ms L Sanins

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35734

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs K Ireland

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35744

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: D G Squire

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35754

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35764

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr D Gaught

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35774

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: G M Webb

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35784

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mary Smith

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35794

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Peter Gallagher

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35804

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: A and M Cooly

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35814

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Jan Locke

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35824

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: D R Ariss

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35834

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Joanne Ferguson

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35844

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Sue Penton

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35854

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: A Taylor

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35864

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35874

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Christopher and Lynne Gilbert-Davies

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35884

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Carolyn and David Blick

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35894

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Gill

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35904

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Price

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35914

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Miss E H Dunwoody

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35924

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: J R Moore

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35934

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35944

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35954

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: I Autwal

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35964

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Fendley

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35974

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr M R Schofield

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35984

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs S M Joseph

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 35994

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr H J Aspinall

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36004

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diane Martin and Mr J Marshall

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.

Object

Representation ID: 36014

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Steven Davison

Huge increase in traffic arising proposed development which is situated in existing areas of serious traffic congestion, e.g. close to junctions M40 and Banbury Road. Concern about the associated increase in air pollution.
No sense in using Greenfield land for mobile population. Greenfield land should be left for agricultural.