Support

Representation ID: 33557

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Crackley Residents' Association

Agree with the strategic policies to protect, enhance and link the natural environment. Also agree with the extension of the areas of restraint within and adjoining towns

Object

Representation ID: 33592

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ray Bullen

Areas of restraint not sufficient instrument to adequately protect environment. Demonstrated by ease with which existing areas of restraint are being rubbed out by Preferred Options. They amount to window dressing and do not offer additional protection over Rural Area Polices. AORs need same status as green belt. Further thought to be given on protecting natural landscape. Rural Area policies apply to all real countryside. Greenbelt is artificial measure to prevent conurbations joining. But this makes real countryside. Hence current attack on greenfield by WDC in an attempt to satisfy unreasonable demands of government.
As conservation is applied to old buildings, it ought to be applied to landscapes/countryside as far as development is concerned.

Support

Representation ID: 33692

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr T Steele

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Support

Comment

Representation ID: 33738

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Sharba Homes

Agent: PJPlanning

This section confuses natural environment objectives with the prevention of coalesence.

Support

Representation ID: 33776

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Shirley Estates

Agent: Davis Planning Partnership

Should include reference to Green Belt on sites on edge of villages.

Support

Representation ID: 33841

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support, but suggest an additional Area of Restraint to the south of Gallows Hill beyond an area we suggest is allocated for employment.

Comment

Representation ID: 33855

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Warwick and Leamington Green Party

The policy options fail to recognise that Green Belt and Green Field sites on the edge of our towns have immense value and must be protected alongside our parks and gardens.

Comment

Representation ID: 33870

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Environment Agency

It is imperative that adequate consideration be given to watercourses and that no deterioration in water quality be allowed.

Support

Representation ID: 33939

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council

Supports options

Object

Representation ID: 33968

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Louis Balestrini

By building on green belt land,how can this be environmentally friendly?

Object

Representation ID: 33998

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Mann

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34006

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Raminder Mann

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34014

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs S K Mann

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34022

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs C Rowley

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34030

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Alison Mann

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34038

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kamalpreet Badesha

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34046

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Francesca Mann

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34054

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Fathers

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34062

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kully Fathers

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34070

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Amrik Mann

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34078

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Charlotte Fathers

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34086

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr N Cheema

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34094

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs R Sandhu

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34102

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr J Mundy

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34110

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Natasha Mann

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34118

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Karl Cosnett

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34126

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Joshua Mann

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34134

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kuldip Mann

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34142

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.

Object

Representation ID: 34150

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Avtar Bains

The loss of green belt land and open spaces will reduce the quality of life for all residents south of the river. The area of restraint should be retained. The plan does not meet the government target that 60% of new building should be on brownfield land. By allowing building on Greenfield land it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas. More housing should be allocated on the Ford Foundry Site.