Support

Representation ID: 141

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R A Chapleo

Agreed - how can one object!

Object

Representation ID: 377

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 452

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 504

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 575

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

If the strategic objective is labelled "crime and disorder" and not community safety.

Object

Representation ID: 638

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 727

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 798

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Support.

Comment

Representation ID: 866

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

Not applicable if plans are stopped

Object

Representation ID: 929

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 1011

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1034

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1100

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1136

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Potential crime areas should be considered as a priority when considering any development. Prevention rather than cure. This is particularly important when proposals are to put large proportions of affordable housing in concentrated areas.

Support

Representation ID: 1199

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1258

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

INCOMPLETE - I cannot comment on an option that is not outlined in detail.

Object

Representation ID: 1323

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

Not enough info

Support

Representation ID: 1389

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1492

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Kundi

Number of people: 2

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 1573

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: B.L.A.S.T.

13b Future option must include alloment space that is well protected and near/close to the allotment users. Also the allotment should be regularly checked by police patrols.

Object

Representation ID: 1712

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1793

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 1854

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1889

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Not enough information.

Support

Representation ID: 1955

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

support

Comment

Representation ID: 2083

Received: 05/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Kerr

The 'Options seem reasonable but I am unable to give a definitive answer without additional knowledge.

Object

Representation ID: 2336

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2452

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 2501

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

Support as this is more appropriately addressed in design guidance or an SPD, which can enable the economic environmental and social benefits of the waterways to be unlocked.

Support

Representation ID: 2569

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Would support any plans to improve community safety.