Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 104

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2000

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: K A Ferguson

Representation Summary:

Large estates lack social cohesion which leads to anit-social behaviour and poor education performance.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2009

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: A. J Daubnley

Representation Summary:


Large estates lack social cohesion which leads to anit-social behaviour and poor education performance.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2020

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

Large estates lack social cohesion which leads to anit-social behaviour and poor education performance.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2063

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

Representation Summary:

more regular reviews would be helpful, after initial year of progress

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2082

Received: 05/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Kerr

Representation Summary:

The 'objective' is commended but I do not have sufficient knowledge of this subject to observe if all the options listed.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2335

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2412

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

Representation Summary:

No.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2451

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2500

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

Representation Summary:

Yes

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2568

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Supplementary planning document to be issued

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2602

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Richard Storey

Representation Summary:

This depends primarily on a sensibly deployed police force, on the ground, but no over-reacting (e.g. Long Marston 2008); stronger control of licenses and sale of liquor - i.e. not a planning issue.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2646

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Representation Summary:

Support.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2694

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Representation Summary:

This is so vague. It is an apple pie statement. Who could disagree?

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2761

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Representation Summary:

Tackle the causes of crime and resource communties at risk with more police and security measures.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2805

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2848

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2887

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2914

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: ALISON ELFWOOD

Representation Summary:

YOU SEEM TO NOT LIVE IN THE REAL WORLD

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3001

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Representation Summary:

With the proposed increased street corners, matters can only get worse.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3103

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3230

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

Representation Summary:

Community safety has to have the backing of police, and so their committment to this is vital.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3234

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

Representation Summary:

This is common sense

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3288

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

Representation Summary:

I support it.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3317

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Caroline Martin

Representation Summary:

Considerable thougth has to be given to the increased traffic on Birches Lane/ Glasshouse Kenilworth.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3339

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3409

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3717

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Representation Summary:

Supported.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3755

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Representation Summary:

Support

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4079

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Keith Turfrey

Representation Summary:

No. Building more housing, especially high density,and improving access will more likely increase crime. Kenilworth is currently a relatively safe area other than when the horsefair etc is on, why create a problem.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4094

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Representation Summary:

As far as I can tell.