Object

Representation ID: 35029

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs A Mellor

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35032

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Emmeline Smart

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 35037

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Emmeline Smart

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35040

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: C N Gardner

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 35045

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: C N Gardner

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35048

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs I.E Rivers

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 35053

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs I.E Rivers

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35056

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs V Michaels

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 35061

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs V Michaels

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35064

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Miss J Houghton

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 35069

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Miss J Houghton

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35072

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Denton

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 35077

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Denton

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35080

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Dennis & Margaret Carvell

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 35085

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Dennis & Margaret Carvell

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35088

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Dawson

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 35093

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Dawson

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35096

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Miss M J Borman

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 35101

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Miss M J Borman

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35104

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Rogers

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 35109

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Rogers

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35112

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: J & D Nash

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 35117

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: J & D Nash

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35120

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Dr Caroline Robinson

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 35125

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Dr Caroline Robinson

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35128

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs W Lowe

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 35133

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs W Lowe

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 35135

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Amount of proposed housing contradicts the vision which aims' to provide a mix of historic towns and villages set within a rural landscape of open farmland and parklands.'

Object

Representation ID: 35145

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Stickley

Amount of proposed housing contradicts the vision which aims' to provide a mix of historic towns and villages set within a rural landscape of open farmland and parklands.'

Object

Representation ID: 35155

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: J J Gregory

Amount of proposed housing contradicts the vision which aims' to provide a mix of historic towns and villages set within a rural landscape of open farmland and parklands.'