Object

Representation ID: 34661

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mark and Karen Footman

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34664

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Peter & Gillian Wells

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34669

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Peter & Gillian Wells

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34672

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alex Rumble

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34677

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alex Rumble

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34680

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen Fitzpatrick

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34685

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen Fitzpatrick

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34688

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: M.P. Cronin

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34693

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: M.P. Cronin

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34704

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Prof & Mrs J.K.A. Bleasdale

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34709

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Prof & Mrs J.K.A. Bleasdale

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34712

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Gordon & Nancy Williamson

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34717

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Gordon & Nancy Williamson

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34720

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Caroline

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34725

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Caroline

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34728

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr C Blundell

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34733

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr C Blundell

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34736

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Alex Phillips, J M McCoy, Y McCoy and another resident

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34741

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Alex Phillips, J M McCoy, Y McCoy and another resident

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34744

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Sylvia M Retterson

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34749

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Sylvia M Retterson

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34752

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs D Beal

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34757

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs D Beal

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34760

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Julia Measures Revell

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34765

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Julia Measures Revell

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34768

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R Price

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34773

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R Price

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34776

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs M Merriman

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34781

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs M Merriman

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34784

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Patricia Robinson

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.