Object

Representation ID: 36616

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: D Smallwood

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36626

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: D Tophan

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36636

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: B Cogan

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36646

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: J R Fisher

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36656

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Jenny and Adrian Beran

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36666

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: P Payne

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36676

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Shirley T Cotterill

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36686

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Jim and Laura Henderson

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36696

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36706

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: G R Stephens

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36716

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: A J Leach

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36726

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs A Lothian

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36736

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P Bains

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36746

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36756

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs S A and K N Loggie

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36766

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Kendall

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36776

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Dr H Eden and Dr A Sharif

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36786

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: N and T Martucci

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36796

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36806

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Freeman

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36816

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Nicola Beasley

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36826

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Tony Platt and Liz McNally

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36836

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupiers

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36846

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36856

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36866

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Julie Tomlinson

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36876

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Jane and Zac Everett

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36886

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: J C Evans

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36896

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36906

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Ian Walker

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?