6.0 Neighbourhood Plan Policies

Showing comments and forms 1 to 8 of 8

Support

Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission

Representation ID: 71818

Received: 25/07/2020

Respondent: Mr EDWIN COOMBS

Representation Summary:

I am a village resident and support our NDP Polices

Full text:

I am a village resident and support our NDP Polices

Object

Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission

Representation ID: 71871

Received: 06/08/2020

Respondent: Stansgate Planning

Representation Summary:

Earlier versions of the draft NDP proposed to identify St Andrews House as a non-designated heritage asset under Policy RS7. In light of representations made by Mr Todd it was agreed that St Andrews House (RS7/16) should be deleted from the list in Policy RS7, and this is the case in the Regulation 16 version. Policy RS7 does not refer to St Andrews House and, furthermore it is not shown on Policy Map 7. However, the building continues to be identified as a non-designated heritage asset on Policy Map 1.

Full text:

Mr R Todd, of Interlocks Surveys Limited, owns and occupiers St Andrews House for business purposes. Earlier versions of the draft NDP proposed to identify St Andrews House as a non-designated heritage asset under Policy RS7. In light of representations made by Mr Todd it was agreed that St Andrews House (RS7/16) should be deleted from the list in Policy RS7, and this is the case in the Regulation 16 version. Policy RS7 does not refer to St Andrews House and, furthermore it is not shown on Policy Map 7. However, the building continues to be identified as a non-designated heritage asset on Policy Map 1.

No doubt this is an oversight but Mr Todd maintains his objection to the identification of his property as a non-designated heritage asset and requests that Policy Map 1 is amended to delete such identification and to ensure it becomes consistent with the wording of Policy RS7 and Policy Map 7.

Support

Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission

Representation ID: 71920

Received: 16/08/2020

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Representation Summary:

I am in agreement with the Policies shown in this Chapter of the RSNDP

Full text:

I am in agreement with the Policies shown in this Chapter of the RSNDP

Object

Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission

Representation ID: 71950

Received: 18/08/2020

Respondent: A.C. Lloyd Homes

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

Policy Map 1 needs to be updated to outline the major housing commitments in Radford Semele such as A C Lloyd's permission for 65 dwellings at Spring Lane which is currently under construction (permission ref: W/14/0433 & W/15/2129).

Full text:

Policy Map 1 needs to be updated to outline the major housing commitments in Radford Semele such as A C Lloyd's permission for 65 dwellings at Spring Lane which is currently under construction (permission ref: W/14/0433 & W/15/2129).

Support

Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission

Representation ID: 71985

Received: 09/07/2020

Respondent: Ms Judy Steele

Representation Summary:

I support all the policies set out in the Plan. I am particularly pleased that road safety for cyclists and pedestrians has been emphasised as we desperately need more safety measures in the village such as pinch points, speed enforcement and footpaths for the new development and to Canalside Community Food.

Full text:

Please see attached.

Attachments:

Support

Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission

Representation ID: 71990

Received: 16/08/2020

Respondent: Mr David Leigh-Hunt

Representation Summary:

In Para 6 of the draft plan 13 Policies are set out; they are well expanded in the succeeding paragraphs.

Full text:

Please see attached.

Attachments:

Object

Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission

Representation ID: 72000

Received: 18/08/2020

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey

Agent: RPS Consulting Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

A number of policies are too prescriptive (RS1, RS6) whilst others are too vague lacking sufficient detail to be effective in judging planning applications (RS3). In addition, greater recognition should be given in the RSNP to the impending increase in housing need at the District-wide level under the Government’s proposed changes to the standard methodology, which will start to bite once the WDLP review commences, most likely prior to 2029 (the end date of the RSNP).

It is contended that the RSNP should not proceed to referendum in its current form, without incorporating some modifications.

Full text:

Please see attached.

Attachments:

Object

Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission

Representation ID: 72001

Received: 18/08/2020

Respondent: A C Lloyd Homes

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

Policy Map 1 needs to be updated to outline the major housing commitments in Radford Semele such as A C Lloyd's permission for 65 dwellings at Spring Lane which is currently under construction (permission ref: W/14/0433 & W/15/2129).

Full text:

Please see attached.