NP1 Neighbourhood Plans

Object

Representation ID: 64537

Received: 26/05/2014

Respondent: Mr Richard Thwaites

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The objections of the Hampton Magna residents have been ignored or over ruled.

The preferred option for development within Hampton Magna is not consistent with local needs and aspirations.

Support

Representation ID: 65571

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Keith Wellsted

Take Neighbourhood Plans into consideration when giving planning permission!!

Object

Representation ID: 67138

Received: 24/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Ray Steele

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Neighbourhood Plans are the lowest priority of WDC. In fact they have ensured that we will not be able to achieve our objectives with all land allocated for housing. Whitnash NP is running behind the Local Plan largely due to WDC not informing Whitnash Parish Council in good time. Despite this the steering committee members have made representations to WDC indicating that Green Field open space within the current boundary of Whitnash be set aside for leisure and cultural use of Whitnash and its neighbouring communities of Radford Semele, South Leamington, Warwick and Bishops Tachbrook.
Although Whitnash NP is in process and WDC have ben made aware of its aims they will not cooperate in attempts to stop building on identified land that is included in the NP. In addition they have forced through a boundary change that removes more identified land. This has been allocated to Leamington for more houses. It effectively negates anything that the steering committee has in their plans that are taking place