H3 Affordable Housing on Rural Exception Sites

Support

Representation ID: 65529

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Keith Wellsted

Gives power in these areas to local people not WDC!

Support

Representation ID: 65997

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: West Midlands HARP Planning Consortium

Agent: Tetlow King Planning Ltd.

We support the Council in its allowing of Rural Exception Schemes. As our comments above show we have reservations that 40% affordable housing will be achieved on all sites. This will reduce the number of affordable houses developed and so positive affordable housing schemes such as this will promote the production of affordable housing.

Object

Representation ID: 66341

Received: 29/07/2014

Respondent: Shirley Estates

Agent: Davis Planning Partnership

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Policy does not accord with presumption in facour of sustainable development as set out in NPPF.

The policy is onerous in its discrimination against outline applications.
Outline application are pracicable and affordable and assist in establishing the principle of development. They can be properly conditioned and supported by realistic legal agreements.

Object

Representation ID: 66534

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Friends of the Earth

Number of people: 4

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

We also make the following comment: Proposed policy H3 c) 1 - the phrase "where possible" should be omitted for clarity. It is actually clarified by part III of this proposed policy.

Object

Representation ID: 66752

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Edward Walpole-Brown

Agent: Brown and Co

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Greater flexibility should be introduced into Policy H3 about the delivery of housing on Rural Exception Sites.