CT4 Extensions to Tourism, Cultural or Leisure Facilities in Rural Areas

Support

Representation ID: 65154

Received: 24/06/2014

Respondent: Sport England

With reference to my comments to CT1, I would recommend that consideration is given to changing the title to Extensions to Tourism, Cultural Sport or Leisure Facilities in Rural Areas

Object

Representation ID: 66234

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: La Salle Investments

Agent: Harris Lamb

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The general approach of the policy is supported however part B needs to be amended. In line with the NPPF Part B of policy should not seek to prevent rural tourism, cultural or leisure developments, simply because they generate significant volumes of additional traffic if that traffic can be mitigated against and does not result in "severe" residual cumulative impacts.

Object

Representation ID: 66748

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Edward Walpole-Brown

Agent: Brown and Co

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Policy does not have sufficient regard to the need to provide new and
supplement existing services in key locations