CT2 Directing New or Extended Visitor Accommodation

Object

Representation ID: 65388

Received: 26/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Nigel Hamilton

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Given that many local hotels have closed or might be in financial difficulty, should there not be a clause in the local plan stating that no additional large hotels ( more than 50 bedrooms) would be permitted without an economic impact study, they would have on existing operators?

Object

Representation ID: 66233

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: La Salle Investments

Agent: Harris Lamb

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

No specific concerns regarding the approach of Policy CT2, however, it fails to take account of the unique circumstances affecting Stoneleigh Park. Stoneleigh Park holds numerous shows and conferences taking place in the site throughout the year where it is necessary for people to stay on the site overnight. The existing hotel has limited capacity and outline planning permission has been granted for a larger hotel on site. Outline planning permission is in place for the development of new and extended camping facilities. However any further applications would be determined in the context of CT2 therefore to add additional clarity additional text should be included to cross reference to the proposed new policy and its guidance on visitor accomodation on the site.

Object

Representation ID: 66773

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Jockey Club Racecourses

Agent: Rapleys LLP

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

We consider that Policy CT2 Directing New or Extended Visitor Accommodation
should cross reference to Policy CT7 and the supporting text at Paragraph 3.142