DS5 Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 64526
Received: 26/05/2014
Respondent: Mr Richard Thwaites
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The government expect the planning system to give local people the opportunity to shape their communities.
The residents of Hampton Magna have not had their concerns taken into account and have, therefore, not had the opportunity to shape their community.
The government expect the planning system to give local people the opportunity to shape their communities.
The residents of Hampton Magna have not had their concerns taken into account and have, therefore, not had the opportunity to shape their community.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65158
Received: 24/06/2014
Respondent: Mrs Pat Robinson
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Nobody has demonstrated how a major development south of Warwick and the river is to be sustainable by the plan's own definition. There are only road connections in the area, and such a concentration of homes with minimal employment will be a car, or perhaps bus using community travelling to Coventry / Birmingham
Nobody has demonstrated how a major development south of Warwick and the river is to be sustainable by the plan's own definition. There are only road connections in the area, and such a concentration of homes with minimal employment will be a car, or perhaps bus using community travelling to Coventry / Birmingham
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65331
Received: 25/06/2014
Respondent: Mr Carl Stevens
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
This presumption is precisely why the re drawing of boundaries in green belt areas should be reviewed. Once approved in the local plan green belt will be easy pickings for developers to get quick planning permission and build.
This presumption is precisely why the re drawing of boundaries in green belt areas should be reviewed. Once approved in the local plan green belt will be easy pickings for developers to get quick planning permission and build.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65484
Received: 27/06/2014
Respondent: The Community Group
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Policy DS5 largely repeats the NPPF but it misrepresents Government policy in so far as there is a glaring omission. The NPPF explicitly excludes Green Belt land from the presumption in favour of sustainable development but this is not recognised in Policy DS5. It is therefore unsound.
Policy DS5 largely repeats the NPPF but it misrepresents Government policy in so far as there is a glaring omission. The NPPF explicitly excludes Green Belt land from the presumption in favour of sustainable development but this is not recognised in Policy DS5. It is therefore unsound.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65486
Received: 27/06/2014
Respondent: The National Trust
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The policy should make it clear that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not override Green Belt policy. This is confirmed in a letter from the Rt Hon Mr David Cameron MP, the Prime Minister, to Mr Crispin Blunt MP dated 19th March 2013.
The policy should make it clear that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not override Green Belt policy. This is confirmed in a letter from the Rt Hon Mr David Cameron MP, the Prime Minister, to Mr Crispin Blunt MP dated 19th March 2013.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65871
Received: 27/06/2014
Respondent: Centaur Homes
Agent: McLoughlin Planning
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
This policy is unnecessary as the presumption is set out in the Framework and this is relevant to all decision taking.
See attachment
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 66085
Received: 27/06/2014
Respondent: Gleeson Developments
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Policy DS5, is entirely consistent with paragraph 14 of the NPPF. The Council's presumption in favour of sustainable development and the need for sustainable economic growth is entirely consistent with paragraph 14 of the NPPF and is supported.
See attachment.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 66262
Received: 26/06/2014
Respondent: Mr H E Johnson
Agent: Bond Dickinson
We support the presumption in favour of sustainable development and the commitment that planning applications which accord with the policies in this Local Plan will be approved without delay
see attached
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 66579
Received: 27/06/2014
Respondent: CPRE WARWICKSHIRE
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Policy DS5 appears to add nothing to the NPPF but it misrepresents Government policy. It is therefore unsound. The NPPF explicitly excludes Green Belt land from the presumption in favour of sustainable development but Policy DS5 makes no mention of this important fact. The Council's persistent failure to acknowledge this, also evident during the Coventry and Warwickshire Gateway public inquiry, goes to the heart of its cavalier approach to the Green Belt. The Plan proposes to remove no fewer than thirteen sites from the Green Belt. This is inconsistent with ministerial statements.
see attached
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 66606
Received: 27/06/2014
Respondent: Richborough Estates Ltd
Agent: Strutt & Parker
Policy DS5 is fully supported and is considered sound. The Framework makes clear that at its heart is the presumption of sustainable development. We consider that Policy DS5 positively responds in this regard.
see attached
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 66790
Received: 26/06/2014
Respondent: Gallagher Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
We welcome the inclusion of a policy in accordance with the presumption in favour of sustainable development set out in the NPPF. Policy DS5 is sound and supported.
see attached.