Riverside House

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Support

Revised Development Strategy

Representation ID: 52634

Received: 01/07/2013

Respondent: Mrs Anne Horsley

Representation Summary:

As long as the new development is in sympathy with the existing housing, this is a sensible option.

Full text:

As long as the new development is in sympathy with the existing housing, this is a sensible option.

Support

Revised Development Strategy

Representation ID: 53400

Received: 23/07/2013

Respondent: Mr Lee Fellows

Representation Summary:

I agree with using brownfield sites rather than green belt as a way of increasing housing capacity in the area.

Full text:

I agree with using brownfield sites rather than green belt as a way of increasing housing capacity in the area.

Support

Revised Development Strategy

Representation ID: 54281

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Mr Andrew Illsley

Representation Summary:

Good use of brown field site

Full text:

Good use of brown field site

Object

Revised Development Strategy

Representation ID: 54374

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: WAYC

Representation Summary:

The Current Council offices are in one place which seems sensible, plus it has adequate parking- what is the argument for changing this - ie where would the Council be housed so its all in one place again. If the plan is to move them into separate offices then why not convert those into houses. If the premises are too large then why not sub rent some of it to voluntary sector organisations?

Full text:

The Current Council offices are in one place which seems sensible, plus it has adequate parking- what is the argument for changing this - ie where would the Council be housed so its all in one place again. If the plan is to move them into separate offices then why not convert those into houses. If the premises are too large then why not sub rent some of it to voluntary sector organisations?