Riverside House
Support
Revised Development Strategy
Representation ID: 52634
Received: 01/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs Anne Horsley
As long as the new development is in sympathy with the existing housing, this is a sensible option.
As long as the new development is in sympathy with the existing housing, this is a sensible option.
Support
Revised Development Strategy
Representation ID: 53400
Received: 23/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Lee Fellows
I agree with using brownfield sites rather than green belt as a way of increasing housing capacity in the area.
I agree with using brownfield sites rather than green belt as a way of increasing housing capacity in the area.
Support
Revised Development Strategy
Representation ID: 54281
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Andrew Illsley
Good use of brown field site
Good use of brown field site
Object
Revised Development Strategy
Representation ID: 54374
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: WAYC
The Current Council offices are in one place which seems sensible, plus it has adequate parking- what is the argument for changing this - ie where would the Council be housed so its all in one place again. If the plan is to move them into separate offices then why not convert those into houses. If the premises are too large then why not sub rent some of it to voluntary sector organisations?
The Current Council offices are in one place which seems sensible, plus it has adequate parking- what is the argument for changing this - ie where would the Council be housed so its all in one place again. If the plan is to move them into separate offices then why not convert those into houses. If the premises are too large then why not sub rent some of it to voluntary sector organisations?