Leamington Fire Station
Object
Revised Development Strategy
Representation ID: 52438
Received: 17/06/2013
Respondent: Rachel Sanders
I believe it is more in the interests of the town to maintain a local fire station than to use the site for development.
I believe it is more in the interests of the town to maintain a local fire station than to use the site for development.
Object
Revised Development Strategy
Representation ID: 52526
Received: 27/06/2013
Respondent: Jon and Rachel Gorrie
Number of people: 2
Concerned about the increased population density in the Milverton area, but more especially the parking impact. It is already impossible to park on certain streets and many surrounding streets have a permit scheme in operation making them unavailable too. This scheme, bringing at least another 200 vehicles into the area, will make the situation considerably worse. Would like to be reassured that the current permit scheme would be extended to cover the streets adjacent to the scheme, not just to the area of the scheme itself, so that the parking position is not detrimentally affected.
Further to the Consultation Document I received last week, as a Milverton resident I am concerned about the increased population density in the area, but more especially the parking impact. It is already impossible to park in my own street and all surrounding streets have a permit scheme in operation making them unavailable too. This scheme, bringing at least another 200 vehicles into the area, will make the situation considerably worse. I would like to be reassured that the current permit scheme would be extended to cover the streets adjacent to the scheme, not just to the area of the scheme itself, so that our parking position is not detrimentally affected.
We are referring to the Riverside House and Fire station developments and we would be pleased if you would treat our email ass a representation against these developments.
Support
Revised Development Strategy
Representation ID: 52632
Received: 01/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs Anne Horsley
This is a sensible options as long as the design of development is sympathetic to the surrounding existing houses.
This is a sensible options as long as the design of development is sympathetic to the surrounding existing houses.
Support
Revised Development Strategy
Representation ID: 53398
Received: 23/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Lee Fellows
I agree with using brownfield sites rather than green belt land as a way of increasing housing capacity in the area.
I agree with using brownfield sites rather than green belt land as a way of increasing housing capacity in the area.
Support
Revised Development Strategy
Representation ID: 54278
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Andrew Illsley
This is good use of a brown field site
This is good use of a brown field site
Support
Revised Development Strategy
Representation ID: 54486
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mr John Watkins
I support the development of brown land for housing.
I support the development of brown land for housing.
Object
Revised Development Strategy
Representation ID: 55466
Received: 27/06/2013
Respondent: Jon and Rachel Gorrie
Number of people: 2
Concerned about the increased population density in the Milverton area, but more especially the parking impact. It is already impossible to park on certain streets and many surrounding streets have a permit scheme in operation making them unavailable too. This scheme, bringing at least another 200 vehicles into the area, will make the situation considerably worse. Would like to be reassured that the current permit scheme would be extended to cover the streets adjacent to the scheme, not just to the area of the scheme itself, so that the parking position is not detrimentally affected.
Further to the Consultation Document I received last week, as a Milverton resident I am concerned about the increased population density in the area, but more especially the parking impact. It is already impossible to park in my own street and all surrounding streets have a permit scheme in operation making them unavailable too. This scheme, bringing at least another 200 vehicles into the area, will make the situation considerably worse. I would like to be reassured that the current permit scheme would be extended to cover the streets adjacent to the scheme, not just to the area of the scheme itself, so that our parking position is not detrimentally affected.
We are referring to the Riverside House and Fire station developments and we would be pleased if you would treat our email ass a representation against these developments.