GT20 Land at Junction 15 of M40
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59739
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs Michelle Brewer
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Access/egress via busy road network would not be safe.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59750
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Miss Imogen Hobson
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Access/egress via busy road network would not be safe.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59760
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Miss Chloe Hobson
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Access/egress via busy road network would not be safe.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59770
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs Sue Lusby
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Access/egress via busy road network would not be safe.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59782
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Stanley Bowden
Access into and out of the site onto A roads is not safe.
Site does not offer ability to access local community facilities.
Loss of valuable farmland.
Site is not for sale/development.
Ex-landfill site therefore not suitable for development/occupation.
Does not allow for peaceful and integraged co-existence with local community.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59879
Received: 25/07/2013
Respondent: C K & Carolyn Broadfield
No easy access to local facilities.
Increased traffic would put undue pressure on roads.
Concerned that taxes being used to provide extensive number of pitches.
Develop with new housing developments where infrastructure can be provided.
Why so many sites in a relatively small area.
On or adjacent to former landfill site.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 60030
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Martin Hatton
Site is too isolated which may encourage anti-social behaviour. Better to allocate sites within towns/settlements and encourage gypsies/travellers to contribute to society.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 60047
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs Valerie Bowden
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Access/egress via busy road network would not be safe.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 60130
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Dr James Gordon
-Adverse visual impact on the rural landscape, harming the character of the area
-Grade 2 classified agricultural land
-No existing utilities on site such as power, water and sewerage
-Risk of flooding
-No convenient access to local amenities
-Noise disturbance from M40
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 60154
Received: 30/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs Jane Canning
Situated on a historic landfill.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
No access to facilities (e.g. doctors, schools etc.) thereby increasing car journeys.
Would not allow for peaceful and integrated co-existence with the local community.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Site is unavailable and not deliverable.
Unacceptable loss of farmland and employment rendering isolated sites unviable.
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 60285
Received: 30/10/2013
Respondent: Dr James Gordon
Green belt land and therefore protected.
Good quality farmland needed for food production.
Some winter flooding on site.
No utilities/services.
No community facilities.
No local work for unskilled.
Site already on Sherbourne boundary on old A46.
See attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 60394
Received: 24/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Christos Christou
Adjacent to historic landfills which may release dangerous greenhouse gases.
Access to the site is stretched by over utilised road.
No paths or cycle lanes.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 60446
Received: 25/07/2013
Respondent: Mr and Mrs K.J. and J V Atkin
The local infrastructure will not support the proposed site.
It is too close to the new racecourse stable block and will have a negative impact on tourism at both the racecourse and the town centre.
We wish to object to the new local plan on the following grounds.
1 The local infrastructure will not support one or more of the proposed gipsy sites.
2 The sites are too close to the new racecourse stable block.
3 We believe the sites will have a negative impact on tourism at both the racecourse and the town center.
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 60456
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs Denise Hobson
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Access/egress via busy road network would not be safe.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 63382
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mr & Mrs John & Angela Fortnum
In summary objections are:-
1. Additional impact on local school and doctors surgery
2. Increased volume of traffic
3. Close proximity to settled community
4. G19 flooding
5. High profile sites as enter into Historic Warwick
Objection to Gypsy and Traveller Sites - GT17, GT18, G19
We would like to object to the building of the above Gypsies and Travellers Sites.
All three sites would greatly impact on Hampton Magna. In recent years Hampton Magna has had to accommodate a considerable amount of additional people due to the building of Hatton Park and Chase Meadow, which has already had an impact on the school and the doctors surgery, plus a large increase in the volume of traffic. Warwick Parkway has also had an impact on the village.
Even though you say that GT17 and GT18 are away from a settled community it is in very close proximity to both Chase Meadow and Hampton Magna and could be even closer to Hampton Magna residence if you build 150 new houses on the village.
G19 is liable to flooding,and all three sites are high profile site for people visiting the historic town of Warwick.
All three sites are on very busy main roads and close to the canal which would surely be a danger to children living there.
In summary our objection are:-
1. Additional impact on local school and doctors surgery
2. Increased volume of traffic
3. Close proximity to settled community
4. G19 flooding
5. hHigh profile sites as enter into Historic Warwick