GT09 Land to the north east of M40
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59462
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: graham leeke
Close to main road with fast moving traffic which will become even busier with new housing developments. Locations will be unhealthy for site residents and access points present new hazard to motorists.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59500
Received: 27/07/2013
Respondent: Bryan Sims
Very busy roads, no pedestrian access, M40 noise, listed buildings, one of which is currently undergoing extensive renovation Potential visual impact on approach to Warwick.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59507
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Simon Sharp
Is situated on landfill site, so an inappropriate location
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
No access to facilities (e.g. doctors, schools etc.) thereby increasing car journeys.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is expanding to accommodate current school children.
Site is unavailable and not deliverable.
Unacceptable loss of farmland and employment rendering isolated sites unviable.
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59524
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Nigel Hudson
Concerned about potential of anti-social behaviour etc that might occur.
Concerned about impact on property values.
Exit/entry onto busy road is dangerous.
Will have negative impact on appearance of Bishop's Tachbrook.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59536
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs Michelle Hudson
Concerned about potential of anti-social behaviour, noise, disturbance etc that might occur.
Concerned about impact on property values.
Will have negative impact on appearance of Bishop's Tachbrook.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59543
Received: 24/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs Jackie Christou
Access/egress is via busy road.
Site is unsuitable given lack of alternatives to car based journeys eg no paths, cycle routes.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59553
Received: 27/07/2013
Respondent: Miss Katie Christou
Access/egress is via busy road.
Site is unsuitable given lack of alternatives to car based journeys eg no paths, cycle routes.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59588
Received: 26/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Chris Braithwaite
Busy roads and area encircled by M40 and Warwick By pass. Noise pollution.
No pedestrian access to site.
Site cannot be integrated into landscape on Banbury Road which is access road to Warwick.
Local schools operating at capacity.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59595
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Michael Brewer
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59607
Received: 19/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Edward Kirkby
Access unsafe.
No ability to access local community facilities.
Loss of important and valuable farmland.
School at capacity.
Not for sale and not available for development.
Ex landfill site and is not suitable for development and/or occupation.
See attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59636
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Kevin Mitchell
Cannot be integrated into landscape without harm to character of area. Approach to Warwick. Damage to tourism. Threat to local businesses.
Potential threat to historic Bishops Tachbrook.
Possible use of site for work and potential pollution.
Good quality arable land needed for food production.
Schools oversubscribed.
Roads are 50mph. No pedestrain footpaths or public transport links.
No safe access and dangerous for large caravans to turn in and out.
Car travel will be utilised as children cannot wait on main road for transport. Unsustainable.
Prone to flooding.
Provision of utilities questionable.
Employemnt availablity a concern.
Control of pitches.
Doctors oversubscribed.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59653
Received: 10/10/2013
Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris
Access onto busy raod. No pedestrian access. Potential visual impact on approach to Warwick. Listed buildings on site.
All sites must be managed by WDC not Travellers themselves. Must be made to pay council tax and for upkeep of suite and maintenance.
Better to locate sites on edge of industrial parks near towns.
See attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59662
Received: 28/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Nigel Pugh
Access only onto busy road. No pedestrian access and potential for visual impact on approach to Warwick. Listed buildings on site.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59680
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs Lynda Wardle
Limited access to public transport, GP and negative impact on school.
Close to M40 adding to dangerous road situation and not peaceful site.
New infrastructure required.
Would destroy habitats and harm environment.
Would not integrate into landscape. Would be very visible.
Would not allow peaceful co-existence with local community.
No restrictions on the amount of people.
Pressure on local services.
Decline in people wishing to live near traveller site.
Devaluation of property and farmland.
Farm owners annoyed at CPO.
Oppose any sites within 3 miles of Barford.
Need for sites not proven.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59692
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Andrew Christou
Access/egress is via busy road.
Site is unsuitable given lack of alternatives to car based journeys eg no paths, cycle routes.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59702
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Simon Hobson
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59712
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs Catherine Wenman
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59722
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Miss Chloe Brewer
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59732
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs Michelle Brewer
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59743
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Miss Imogen Hobson
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59753
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Miss Chloe Hobson
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59763
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs Sue Lusby
Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59775
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Mr Stanley Bowden
Access into and out of the site onto A roads is not safe.
Site does not offer ability to access local community facilities.
Loss of valuable farmland.
Barford school does not have capacity for additional children.
Site is not for sale/development.
Ex-landfill site therefore not suitable for development/occupation.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59825
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Sarah williams
Village has very few resources.
School is oversubscribed and couldn't meet demands of GT community.
Site backs onto busy road putting children and adults at risk as there are no pavements and a lack of public transport.
No pedestrian access.
Negative visual impact on visitors to Warwick.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59872
Received: 25/07/2013
Respondent: C K & Carolyn Broadfield
No easy access to local facilities.
Increased traffic would put undue pressure on roads.
Concerned that taxes being used to provide extensive number of pitches.
Develop with new housing developments where infrastructure can be provided.
Why so many sites in a relatively small area.
On or adjacent to previous landfill site.
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59896
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: P E Hunt
District council should not relinquish any land for this use. Bad experience of previous and existing sites elsewhere.
Threat to village way of life.
Encroachment into countryside.
Will planning law be relaxed similarly for other land owners?
Hazardous congestion would interfere with flow of traffic heading to M40.
Ruin approach to historic Warwick.
Such sites never enhance beauty of countryside.
GP practice busy.
School is full and there would be a need for special needs training assistants to support traveller children.
Provision by government/district council for compensation resulting from increased damage and theft that can be attributed to residents of G&T sites.
Property prices will fall.
Should be safeguard for safety and welfare of all people.
If council in control of sites, they may be more acceptable.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59901
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Sheila Hayward
Remote from centres and amenities.
Access onto busy road with no pedestrian access.
Listed buildings.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59915
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Helen Lavery
Cannot be integrated into landscape without harming character of the area.
Threat to historical Bishop's Tachbrook and possible damage to listed buildings.
Site on good quality agricultural land needed for food production.
Adverse impact on natural and historic environment including pollution and contamination of the Tach Brook.
Remote and with no pedestrian links/public transport.
Lack of full time GP surgery and of school places. Impact on education of existing children if educationally disadvantaged children join the school with no additional resources on offer.
Access directly onto busy road with high traffic flow dangerous to large slow moving vehicles and to other road users.
Lack of employment for GT community.
Perceived increase in crime rates.
Decrease in house values. Stigma attached to such sites with knock on effects on local businesses and the tourist industry.
Within highly visible area with impact on historic Warwick. Potential impact on tourism.
Site will not promote peaceful integrated co-existence.
Alarm at number of sites proposed close to Bishop's Tachbrook.
Brownfield sites should be utilised instead of green belt, countryside and english heritage. All facilities are available within the town.
Occupancy cannot be regulated. Sites to be operated by GT community and not Council means there will be no way of restricting numbers or of expansion of sites.
see-attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59922
Received: 21/10/2013
Respondent: Mr John Lawrence
Cannot be integrated into landscape without harming character of the area.
Threat to historical Bishop's Tachbrook and possible damage to listed buildings.
Site on good quality agricultural land needed for food production.
Adverse impact on natural and historic environment including pollution and contamination of the Tach Brook.
Remote and with no pedestrian links/public transport.
Lack of full time GP surgery and of school places. Impact on education of existing children if educationally disadvantaged children join the school with no additional resources on offer.
Access directly onto busy road with high traffic flow dangerous to large slow moving vehicles and to other road users.
Lack of employment for GT community.
Perceived increase in crime rates.
Decrease in house values. Stigma attached to such sites with knock on effects on local businesses and the tourist industry.
Within highly visible area with impact on historic Warwick. Potential impact on tourism.
Site will not promote peaceful integrated co-existence.
Alarm at number of sites proposed close to Bishop's Tachbrook.
Brownfield sites should be utilised instead of green belt, countryside and english heritage. All facilities are available within the town.
Occupancy cannot be regulated. Sites to be operated by GT community and not Council means there will be no way of restricting numbers or of expansion of sites.
See attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 59930
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Karen Wood
Majority of sites proposed around Bishop's Tachbrook. Village has few resources. Most villagers commute to work. No pedestrian access and negative visual impact for tourists.
School is oversubscribed. Will school have resources to support children with little formal education and struggling to integrate into that environment.
Secondary school also oversubscribed.
All sites remote from employment and facilities.
Limited public transport.
see-attached