GT09 Land to the north east of M40

Showing comments and forms 91 to 120 of 134

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59462

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: graham leeke

Representation Summary:

Close to main road with fast moving traffic which will become even busier with new housing developments. Locations will be unhealthy for site residents and access points present new hazard to motorists.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59500

Received: 27/07/2013

Respondent: Bryan Sims

Representation Summary:

Very busy roads, no pedestrian access, M40 noise, listed buildings, one of which is currently undergoing extensive renovation Potential visual impact on approach to Warwick.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59507

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Mr Simon Sharp

Representation Summary:

Is situated on landfill site, so an inappropriate location
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
No access to facilities (e.g. doctors, schools etc.) thereby increasing car journeys.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is expanding to accommodate current school children.
Site is unavailable and not deliverable.
Unacceptable loss of farmland and employment rendering isolated sites unviable.
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59524

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Mr Nigel Hudson

Representation Summary:

Concerned about potential of anti-social behaviour etc that might occur.
Concerned about impact on property values.
Exit/entry onto busy road is dangerous.
Will have negative impact on appearance of Bishop's Tachbrook.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59536

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Mrs Michelle Hudson

Representation Summary:

Concerned about potential of anti-social behaviour, noise, disturbance etc that might occur.
Concerned about impact on property values.
Will have negative impact on appearance of Bishop's Tachbrook.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59543

Received: 24/07/2013

Respondent: Mrs Jackie Christou

Representation Summary:

Access/egress is via busy road.
Site is unsuitable given lack of alternatives to car based journeys eg no paths, cycle routes.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59553

Received: 27/07/2013

Respondent: Miss Katie Christou

Representation Summary:

Access/egress is via busy road.
Site is unsuitable given lack of alternatives to car based journeys eg no paths, cycle routes.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59588

Received: 26/07/2013

Respondent: Mr Chris Braithwaite

Representation Summary:

Busy roads and area encircled by M40 and Warwick By pass. Noise pollution.
No pedestrian access to site.
Site cannot be integrated into landscape on Banbury Road which is access road to Warwick.
Local schools operating at capacity.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59595

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Mr Michael Brewer

Representation Summary:

Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59607

Received: 19/07/2013

Respondent: Mr Edward Kirkby

Representation Summary:

Access unsafe.
No ability to access local community facilities.
Loss of important and valuable farmland.
School at capacity.
Not for sale and not available for development.
Ex landfill site and is not suitable for development and/or occupation.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59636

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Mr Kevin Mitchell

Representation Summary:

Cannot be integrated into landscape without harm to character of area. Approach to Warwick. Damage to tourism. Threat to local businesses.
Potential threat to historic Bishops Tachbrook.
Possible use of site for work and potential pollution.
Good quality arable land needed for food production.
Schools oversubscribed.
Roads are 50mph. No pedestrain footpaths or public transport links.
No safe access and dangerous for large caravans to turn in and out.
Car travel will be utilised as children cannot wait on main road for transport. Unsustainable.
Prone to flooding.
Provision of utilities questionable.
Employemnt availablity a concern.
Control of pitches.
Doctors oversubscribed.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59653

Received: 10/10/2013

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Representation Summary:

Access onto busy raod. No pedestrian access. Potential visual impact on approach to Warwick. Listed buildings on site.
All sites must be managed by WDC not Travellers themselves. Must be made to pay council tax and for upkeep of suite and maintenance.
Better to locate sites on edge of industrial parks near towns.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59662

Received: 28/07/2013

Respondent: Mr Nigel Pugh

Representation Summary:

Access only onto busy road. No pedestrian access and potential for visual impact on approach to Warwick. Listed buildings on site.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59680

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Mrs Lynda Wardle

Representation Summary:

Limited access to public transport, GP and negative impact on school.
Close to M40 adding to dangerous road situation and not peaceful site.
New infrastructure required.
Would destroy habitats and harm environment.
Would not integrate into landscape. Would be very visible.
Would not allow peaceful co-existence with local community.
No restrictions on the amount of people.
Pressure on local services.
Decline in people wishing to live near traveller site.
Devaluation of property and farmland.
Farm owners annoyed at CPO.
Oppose any sites within 3 miles of Barford.
Need for sites not proven.

Full text:

see-attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59692

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Mr Andrew Christou

Representation Summary:

Access/egress is via busy road.
Site is unsuitable given lack of alternatives to car based journeys eg no paths, cycle routes.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59702

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Mr Simon Hobson

Representation Summary:

Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59712

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Wenman

Representation Summary:

Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.

Full text:

see-attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59722

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Miss Chloe Brewer

Representation Summary:

Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.

Full text:

see-attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59732

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Mrs Michelle Brewer

Representation Summary:

Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.

Full text:

see-attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59743

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Miss Imogen Hobson

Representation Summary:

Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.

Full text:

see-attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59753

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Miss Chloe Hobson

Representation Summary:

Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.

Full text:

see-attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59763

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Mrs Sue Lusby

Representation Summary:

Site is situated on historic landfill and may release greenhouse gases.
Adjoins The Asps which WDC previously concluded should remain undeveloped, particularly given the impact Warwick Castle and its park.
Deer roam freely from Castle Grounds to this site.
Vehicle access would be dangerous to and from the site.
Local facilities cannot be accessed on foot, bike or public transport thereby increasing reliance on car journeys which adds to pressure on highway infrastructure and is unsustainable.
Will lead to loss of farmland and rural employment making such sites isolated sites unviable.
Negative impact on Barford St. Peter's School which is already having to expand. Further influx will reduce places for local residents.
Disregards Rural Area Policies: RAPs 1 (New Housing), 6 (New Employment), 10 (Safeguarding Rural Roads) and 15 (Camping and caravan Sites).
Adverse visual impact and cannot successfully be integrated into the landscape.
Site does not allow for peaceful co-existence with community.

Full text:

see-attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59775

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Mr Stanley Bowden

Representation Summary:

Access into and out of the site onto A roads is not safe.
Site does not offer ability to access local community facilities.
Loss of valuable farmland.
Barford school does not have capacity for additional children.
Site is not for sale/development.
Ex-landfill site therefore not suitable for development/occupation.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59825

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Sarah williams

Representation Summary:

Village has very few resources.
School is oversubscribed and couldn't meet demands of GT community.
Site backs onto busy road putting children and adults at risk as there are no pavements and a lack of public transport.
No pedestrian access.
Negative visual impact on visitors to Warwick.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59872

Received: 25/07/2013

Respondent: C K & Carolyn Broadfield

Representation Summary:

No easy access to local facilities.
Increased traffic would put undue pressure on roads.
Concerned that taxes being used to provide extensive number of pitches.
Develop with new housing developments where infrastructure can be provided.
Why so many sites in a relatively small area.
On or adjacent to previous landfill site.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59896

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: P E Hunt

Representation Summary:

District council should not relinquish any land for this use. Bad experience of previous and existing sites elsewhere.
Threat to village way of life.
Encroachment into countryside.
Will planning law be relaxed similarly for other land owners?
Hazardous congestion would interfere with flow of traffic heading to M40.
Ruin approach to historic Warwick.
Such sites never enhance beauty of countryside.
GP practice busy.
School is full and there would be a need for special needs training assistants to support traveller children.
Provision by government/district council for compensation resulting from increased damage and theft that can be attributed to residents of G&T sites.
Property prices will fall.
Should be safeguard for safety and welfare of all people.
If council in control of sites, they may be more acceptable.

Full text:

see-attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59901

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Sheila Hayward

Representation Summary:

Remote from centres and amenities.
Access onto busy road with no pedestrian access.
Listed buildings.

Full text:

see-attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59915

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Helen Lavery

Representation Summary:

Cannot be integrated into landscape without harming character of the area.
Threat to historical Bishop's Tachbrook and possible damage to listed buildings.
Site on good quality agricultural land needed for food production.
Adverse impact on natural and historic environment including pollution and contamination of the Tach Brook.
Remote and with no pedestrian links/public transport.
Lack of full time GP surgery and of school places. Impact on education of existing children if educationally disadvantaged children join the school with no additional resources on offer.
Access directly onto busy road with high traffic flow dangerous to large slow moving vehicles and to other road users.
Lack of employment for GT community.
Perceived increase in crime rates.
Decrease in house values. Stigma attached to such sites with knock on effects on local businesses and the tourist industry.
Within highly visible area with impact on historic Warwick. Potential impact on tourism.
Site will not promote peaceful integrated co-existence.
Alarm at number of sites proposed close to Bishop's Tachbrook.
Brownfield sites should be utilised instead of green belt, countryside and english heritage. All facilities are available within the town.
Occupancy cannot be regulated. Sites to be operated by GT community and not Council means there will be no way of restricting numbers or of expansion of sites.

Full text:

see-attached

Attachments:

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59922

Received: 21/10/2013

Respondent: Mr John Lawrence

Representation Summary:

Cannot be integrated into landscape without harming character of the area.
Threat to historical Bishop's Tachbrook and possible damage to listed buildings.
Site on good quality agricultural land needed for food production.
Adverse impact on natural and historic environment including pollution and contamination of the Tach Brook.
Remote and with no pedestrian links/public transport.
Lack of full time GP surgery and of school places. Impact on education of existing children if educationally disadvantaged children join the school with no additional resources on offer.
Access directly onto busy road with high traffic flow dangerous to large slow moving vehicles and to other road users.
Lack of employment for GT community.
Perceived increase in crime rates.
Decrease in house values. Stigma attached to such sites with knock on effects on local businesses and the tourist industry.
Within highly visible area with impact on historic Warwick. Potential impact on tourism.
Site will not promote peaceful integrated co-existence.
Alarm at number of sites proposed close to Bishop's Tachbrook.
Brownfield sites should be utilised instead of green belt, countryside and english heritage. All facilities are available within the town.
Occupancy cannot be regulated. Sites to be operated by GT community and not Council means there will be no way of restricting numbers or of expansion of sites.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 59930

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Karen Wood

Representation Summary:

Majority of sites proposed around Bishop's Tachbrook. Village has few resources. Most villagers commute to work. No pedestrian access and negative visual impact for tourists.
School is oversubscribed. Will school have resources to support children with little formal education and struggling to integrate into that environment.
Secondary school also oversubscribed.
All sites remote from employment and facilities.
Limited public transport.

Full text:

see-attached

Attachments: