Issue and Options 2023

Yn ôl at y ddogfen

Chwilio am ymatebion i ffurflenni

Canlyniadau chwilio Ragley Estate

Chwilio o’r newydd

ID Ffurflen: 82823

Ymatebydd: Ragley Estate

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

Ni roddwyd ateb

ID Ffurflen: 82825

Ymatebydd: Ragley Estate

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Dim byd wedi’i ddewis

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

Ni roddwyd ateb

ID Ffurflen: 82827

Ymatebydd: Ragley Estate

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Inappropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Inappropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Inappropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Inappropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Appropriate strategy

ID Ffurflen: 82829

Ymatebydd: Ragley Estate

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

dewiswyd

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

dewiswyd

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut i ddefnyddio’r system ac i wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.