Yes

ID sylw: 86150

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 87063

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Judith Corless

x

Yes

ID sylw: 87444

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Other

ID sylw: 89120

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Subject to all the comments already made
Additionally it is vital that there is robust phasing plan in the plan to ensure that development occurs broadly evenly across the plan period and there is not a bulge of new development immediatly the plan is approved

Yes

ID sylw: 89167

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr nigel Freeth

we need to limit the development of our green space to protect the environment and enhance the poor grade land to environmental projects and CO2 capture

Yes

ID sylw: 89168

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr nigel Freeth

we must protect our green open spaces to farm or on poor grade land use this for environmental projects and CO2 capture

Yes

ID sylw: 89169

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr nigel Freeth

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 89464

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barrie Hayles

Neighbourhood Plans were put in place after vast time was spent by local communities with their elected representatives and should be fully supported by County/District planners without being undermined. Over development often with inadequate existing infrastructure has impacted badly on existing residents, reducing the quality of life. Roads/junctions, water/sewage pipework and health service accessibility and more have deteriorated in South Warwickshire for existing residents due to vastly increased pressure from concentrated population growth. This Plan with so much more development proposed exasperates the problems still further. Commenting on all its enormous complexities and implications is extremely difficult for residents.

Yes

ID sylw: 89763

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Compton Verney

n/a

No

ID sylw: 91608

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Maxine Mayer

The whole plan fails to address the Warwickshire Minerals Safeguarded Area (map attached). Whilst this valuable resource for sand and gravel presents financial benefits it can also reduce timely delivery or settlements and strategic growth areas -attached is WCC statutory consultation to the airfield planning application sent to you as an example of impact when EIA's have failed to address this impact.

Yes

ID sylw: 91731

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

No

ID sylw: 91841

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Matthew Hetherington

The proposed SG24 development raises significant concerns. Flooding risks (surface and foul) are high. Infrastructure, including transport and connectivity, is inadequate. Train services face parking and timing issues. Increased emissions from traffic, especially during motorway closures, will worsen air quality. Road conditions and access are poor, with many single-track roads. Expected road connections are unsuitable (S278) due to blind spots and biodiversity impacts. There's a lack of schools and medical facilities. The allocation of the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is unclear. Waste management is problematic. The development threatens the village's community feel, historic woodland, and environmental assets, including the canal.

No

ID sylw: 92018

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Valerie Whittaker

With regard to site SG07 this land is Green Belt and the purposes of Green Belt to to stop urban sprawl and maintain a distance between towns and villages. In addition, the traffic generated by such an industrial site would cause huge problems for people using the A4177 trying to get to the A46 and beyond. Warwick itself has limited capacity for road expansion and the whole area would be gridlocked.

Other

ID sylw: 92665

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson

No comment

Yes

ID sylw: 93051

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Blake

Above my pay grade to alter this

No

ID sylw: 93970

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carina Taylor

It's all too bitty, not joined up, communities will be isolated particularly in the Alcester and Bidford area who will benefit from job opportunities in Leamingtion and surrounding areas. Much better to build a whole New Town!

No

ID sylw: 94906

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

Suggest adding definition of decentralized energy systems.

Yes

ID sylw: 95150

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Susan Frawley

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 95318

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

No further comment

Yes

ID sylw: 95792

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes Western

Asiant : Marrons

A number of amendments are proposed to align definitions with national policy.

Yes

ID sylw: 95875

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

yes

Yes

ID sylw: 95984

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

yes

Other

ID sylw: 97141

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) has no comments on this Chapter.

Other

ID sylw: 97287

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

A number of amendments are proposed to align definitions with national policy.

No

ID sylw: 97309

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs June Holley

NA

Yes

ID sylw: 98144

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited

Asiant : Marrons

A number of amendments are proposed to align definitions with national policy.

Yes

ID sylw: 98625

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

A number of amendments are proposed to align definitions with national policy.

Yes

ID sylw: 99316

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs JILL CHAMBERS

n/a

Other

ID sylw: 99977

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Simpson

I wasn't sure where else to put general comments so here we go:

From reading the responses to the first consolation it is clear there is a large gap in expectation and opinions between developers and residents on a number of points and the officers have pointed this out.
We the public have a right to expect that the council will protect our interests and opinions and not be swayed by the money being held up by developers and land promotors.

No

ID sylw: 100495

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Draper

C1 settlement proposal - comments
Existing infrastructure - will not support CI settlement proposal
Transport Assessment - Extra traffic will be forced onto the existing lanes and B roads during settlement construction and subsequent occupation. The surrounding Lanes have unsuitable narrow bridges over the extensive canal routes and also a height restricted railway bridge at Lapworth The major increase of construction traffic and new residents vehicles will increase hazards and dangers and will put pedestrians and horse riders at increased risk, and have a negative impact to the Wellbeing of the current residents of Kingswood, Rowington and Lapworth.