Yes

ID sylw: 97833

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 97949

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Brenda Stewart

no comment

No

ID sylw: 98134

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited

Asiant : Marrons

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

Yes

ID sylw: 98538

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Newbould

na

No

ID sylw: 98630

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

Other

ID sylw: 98687

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alice Hibbert

Vital open spaces in designated green belt land that are a key asset to the community should be safeguarded - such as Clopton Quarter in SG18.

Yes

ID sylw: 99034

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cotswold District Council

Support

Yes

ID sylw: 99170

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Kennedy

Plans should consider increased density of housing to allow for more public open space in developments and greater opportunities for community building.

No

ID sylw: 99332

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

The suggestion that that when this is not possible contributions will be required to enhance or provide new open spaces within 400m of development is inappropriate.

Yes

ID sylw: 99677

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

agree

No

ID sylw: 100086

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Welford on Avon Parish Council

Councils should do more that just 'seek' to provide open spaces. they should get actively involved and not just through the planning process.

Yes

ID sylw: 100448

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rebecca Loades

Agreed

Yes

ID sylw: 100490

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

Open spaces must be protected.

No

ID sylw: 100811

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Garry Rollason

Development involving the loss of any open space must never be permitted.

Other

ID sylw: 100855

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Judy Steele

If this is enforced then I agree with it.

No

ID sylw: 100923

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

The suggestion that when it is not possible to provide POS on site, contributions will be required to enhance or provide new open spaces within 400m of development is inappropriate and the 400m distance threshold should be removed.

Yes

ID sylw: 101133

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Rowington Landowner Consortium

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

The landowner consortium generally agrees with the policy direction, subject to the detailed policy wording relevant to this policy direction. Larger development proposals including new settlements will likely be able to provide a robust mix of uses complemented by publicly accessible open space thereby providing significant community benefits. The detailed policies should provide sufficient clarity, but include flexibility in consideration of the various site specific requirements.

No

ID sylw: 101226

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Hallam Land Management Limited

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

No

ID sylw: 101245

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mac Mic Group

Asiant : Marrons

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

No

ID sylw: 101390

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bellway Strategic Land / Ashberry Strategic Land

Asiant : Marrons

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach. The policy is not consistent with paragraph 104 of the NPPF which provides situations whereby existing open space could be lost to built development. In addition, the delivery of open space within a 400m distance of development should be ‘where possible’ and ‘where it is practical’ for the development rather than a blanket approach. The policy should be amended to reflect this.

No

ID sylw: 101513

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

No

ID sylw: 101565

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Hallam Land

Asiant : Marrons

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

Yes

ID sylw: 101642

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Zoe Leventhal

Support - public space particularly since Covid is of vital importance for its own sake and also for mental and physical health. Policies should be strengthened and protected

No

ID sylw: 101743

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Rollason

This development is not good for the area

Yes

ID sylw: 101900

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Strongly agree

It is vitally important that open spaces will be provided in the first instance onsite within a development.

To echo our comments in 11.8.a, we note that Bishop’s Tachbrook Country Park and the desire, noted in the ‘made’ BTNDP to expand it to provide a buffer zone between Heathcote and BT village does not figure info the maps or descriptions in Section 4 of this draft plan. This is of utmost importance to the Parish Council.

Yes

ID sylw: 102038

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Walkden

Maintaining existing open spaces has to be the priority especially around existing urban areas

Other

ID sylw: 102248

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited

Asiant : Turley

89. IM Land note that the intent of the policy is positive. The definition of open space should be included in policy wording and so that is clear for everyone, reducing ambiguity and potential disputes. The first bullet point should be updated to the following,
“Development involving the loss of open space of public value will not be permitted unless significant public benefits outweigh the loss.”
90. IM Land would welcome an opportunity to review and comments on the future guidance referred to within Draft Policy Direction 43c.

No

ID sylw: 102381

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough

Asiant : Marrons

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

Yes

ID sylw: 102466

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

BDW generally agrees with the policy direction, subject to the detailed policy wording relevant to this policy direction. Larger development proposals, such as the site at Cophams Hill, will likely be able to provide a robust mix of uses complemented by publicly accessible open space thereby providing significant community benefits. The detailed policies should provide sufficient clarity but include flexibility in consideration of the various site-specific requirements.

No

ID sylw: 103126

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes

Asiant : Marrons

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.