No

ID sylw: 93326

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr geoff marston

The councils’ intention to ‘explore opportunities’ for higher than 10% Biodiversity Net Gain (the absolute bare minimum) is somewhat pathetic. Explore is a cop out word for do nothing.

Local planning evidence derived through planning applications shows that more than 10% BNG is achievable in Warwickshire (Warks wildlife Trust), and the Plan states that they are aiming to link with local priorities, so a greater target should be delivered. A number of other Councils such as Cornwall Council have already got plans through Examination with 20% net gain.

Yes

ID sylw: 93390

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Haggarty

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 93477

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Vivien Haggarty

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 93554

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

We agree with all these policy directions but they tend to be the last things that developers do and are either not done well or not at all so implementation needs to be monitored and the planning authority must ensure compliance. Planning approval should include penalties if developers do not do what they say they are going to do.

No

ID sylw: 93600

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr JAMES STEWART

I do not agree with this policy because purchasing biodiversity units as a form of “offsetting” does nothing to improve real biodiversity. Protecting and enhancing existing ecosystems is far more effective than relying on theoretical compensation. Research shows that developers often fail to implement the ecological enhancements they promise, making “net gain” an empty commitment in over 50% of cases. This is a systemic issue and a regulatory failure. Instead of allowing biodiversity loss on paper, we must safeguard and support areas of high ecological value already in existence. Source: Wild Justice Report

No

ID sylw: 93677

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Claire STEWART

I disagree with this policy because purchasing biodiversity units as “offsetting” fails to deliver real environmental benefits. Protecting and enhancing existing ecosystems is far more effective than relying on theoretical compensation. Research shows that developers frequently neglect their promised ecological improvements, with “net gain” often remaining unfulfilled in over 50% of cases. This represents a systemic failure in regulation and enforcement. Rather than allowing biodiversity loss to be justified on paper, we must prioritize safeguarding and strengthening areas of high ecological value that already exist. Source: Wild Justice Report

Yes

ID sylw: 93719

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong

Yes, particularly in looking to a higher level of BNG than the 10% minimum. Also it is key to ensure biodiversity unit assessment takes into account changes at a site before the application, to avoid developers removing trees/habitats before submitting plans in order to reduce the BNG they have to meet. This practice is possibly in evidence already at a site near Kenilworth (ref [redacted] - significant reduction in hedgerow height). Remote sensing timeseries data provides an archive of sites going back several years and could provide evidence.

Yes

ID sylw: 93834

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwick District Green Party

Yes. In looking at whether BNG in excess of 10% is desirable the plan should draw on the experience of other local authorities where a higher rate has been approved. Measuring BNG is a process involving both evidence and judgement, and the authorities need to be confident that they have the resources and expertise to review and interrogate BNG plans put forward by developers. There is otherwise a danger that this becomes another box-ticking exercise rather than a genuine commitment to enhance biodiversity. SDC and WDC should start now to develop a scheme of offsite biodiversity units within their areas.

Other

ID sylw: 93842

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Penny Gray

It concerns me that this direction encourages monetising the natural environment. Alternative provision through purchasing 'offsite biodiversity units' sounds like numerous carbon offsetting schemes that have proven to be scams. Biodiversity gains should be demonstrable on site, not off site.

No

ID sylw: 93922

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Beverley Comley

Biodiversity should be at the site not offloaded elsewhere

Yes

ID sylw: 93989

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sue Scurrah

-

No

ID sylw: 94129

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Kelly

Purchasing of ‘biodiversity units’ as a way of ‘off-setting’ will never improve
biodiversity. Supporting the existing biodiversity, safeguarding and supporting areas of higher biodiversity already in existence is crucial. Research shows that developers aren’t implementing the ecological and biodiversity enhancements they originally claim to. This is a huge systemic issue and regulatory failure. In over 50% of cases the ‘net-gain’ exists only in on paper not in practice. Article reference: https://wildjustice.org.uk/general/lost-nature-report/

Other

ID sylw: 94142

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Samantha Stafford Scott

“Offsetting” is not an option and shouldn’t be considered as a means of improving biodiversity. It is counterintuitive to not simply protect and safeguard the existing biodiversity. Developers have no interest in providing this and I am yet to see any evidence that they are implementing the regulations. As such, Development should not be permitted on sites that put current biodiversity at risk!

Other

ID sylw: 94156

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Holly Whittaker

The purchasing of 'biodiversity units' as a way of 'off-setting' will never improve biodiversity.

Supporting the existing biodiversity, safeguarding and supporting areas of higher biodiversity already in existence, is crucial. Research shows that developers are not implementing the ecological and biodiversity enhancements they originally claim to. This is a huge systematic issue and regulatory failure. In over 50% of cases the 'net gain' exists only on paper and not in practice. Article reference: https://wildjustice.org.uk/general/lost-nature-report/

No

ID sylw: 94379

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Blandamer

Warwickshire Wildlife Trust is not satisfied with the councils' intention to 'explore opportunities for higher than the bare minimum of 10% Biodiversity Net Gain.
Local evidence through planning applications shows that more than 10% BNG is achievable in Warwickshire.
Purchasing of 'biodiversity units' as a way of 'off-setting' will never improve biodiversity. Supporting the existing biodiversity is crucial. Research shows that developers aren't implementing the ecological and biodiversity enhancements they originally claim to. Article reference: https://wildjustice.org.uk/general/lost-nature-report/

No

ID sylw: 94658

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Renny Wodynska

No. The councils’ intention to ‘explore opportunities’ for higher than the bare minimum of 10% Biodiversity Net Gain is pathetic and neither here nor there.

Local evidence through planning applications shows that more than 10% BNG is achievable in Warwickshire, a greater target should be delivered. A number of other Councils such as Cornwall Council have already got plans through Examination with 20% net gain.

Other

ID sylw: 94950

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

'Off setting' will eved improve biodiversity. I work as an estate agent and new developments never stick to their claims when developing sites and creating biodiversity.

Other

ID sylw: 95065

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Tracey Grimes

Developers are notorious for spending the bare minimum or not fulfilling what they said they would do. Enhancing an existing biodiversity ecosystem would be far superior than offsetting new ideas.

No

ID sylw: 95245

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

as drafted it is hard to agree the approach. The policy appears to give a developer the chance to over develop a site, prove that on-site mitigation is not achievable, and turn to an apparently un-monitored trading arrangement to “buy credits”. Furthermore those credits can be for theoretical locations nowhere near the site where the damage is being created. Local biodiversity is therefore irreparably damaged and unproven gain is claimed for unknown locations

No

ID sylw: 95267

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Emma Restall Orr

It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan. The approach here shows a lack of understanding and a lack of commitment to fundamental ecological requirements.

No

ID sylw: 95311

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alamo

Asiant : Harris Lamb

No justification for a higher than 10% requirement. If this is to be pursued it should be viability tested.

Other

ID sylw: 95337

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Lee Tallen

Agree generally, but we have seen through things such as 'offsetting schemes' through air travel that off setting never makes up for the damage done. Feel the purchase of biodiversity credits would represent a 'cop out' and not have any impact of positive biodiversity gains.

No

ID sylw: 95339

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kristina Tristram

No. Not satisfied with the councils' intention to 'explore opportunities' for higher than the bare minimum of 10% Biodiversity Net Gain. Local evidence through planning applications shows that more than 10% BNG is achievable in Warwickshire, and the plan states that they are aiming to link with local priorities, so a greater target should be delivered. A number of other Councils such as Cornwall Council have already got plans through Examination with 20% net gain.

No

ID sylw: 95470

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sue Cuff

Warwickshire Wildlife Trust is not satisfied with the councils’ intention to ‘explore opportunities’ for higher than the bare minimum of 10% Biodiversity Net Gain.

Local evidence through planning applications shows that more than 10% BNG is achievable in Warwickshire, and the Plan states that they are aiming to link with local priorities, so a greater target should be delivered. A number of other Councils such as Cornwall Council have already got plans through Examination with 20% net gain.

No

ID sylw: 95526

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Freeman

I am not satised with the councils’ intention to ‘explore opportunities’ for higher than the bare minimum of 10% Biodiversity Net Gain.
Local evidence through planning applications shows that more than 10% BNG is achievable in
Warwickshire, and the Plan states that they are aiming to link with local priorities, so a greater
target should be delivered. A number of other Councils such as Cornwall Council have already
got plans through Examination with 20% net gain.

No

ID sylw: 95710

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Wilson Homes

Asiant : Harris Lamb

seeking BNG of more than 10% will have viability issues. It shouldn't be sought if the councils want to ensure an efficient use of land.

Yes

ID sylw: 95776

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes Western

Asiant : Marrons

This policy reflects the national requirements for a minimum of 10% with regards to Biodiversity Net Gain.

Other

ID sylw: 95965

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes. How will the commitment to 30 years be secured from developers? What sanctions will there be if a developer goes bankrupt during the 30 year period or reneges on his commitments (local authorities often have difficulty in getting developers to fulfil their obligations under current S106 and S278 agreements)?

No

ID sylw: 96085

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Tamsin Kashap

No. Warwickshire Wildlife Trust is not satisfied with the councils’ intention to ‘explore opportunities’ for higher than the bare minimum of 10% Biodiversity Net Gain.

Local evidence through planning applications shows that more than 10% BNG is achievable in Warwickshire, and the Plan states that they are aiming to link with local priorities, so a greater target should be delivered. A number of other Councils such as Cornwall Council have already got plans through Examination with 20% net gain.

No

ID sylw: 96126

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rosemary Collier

I am not satisfied with the councils’ intention to ‘explore opportunities’ for higher than the bare minimum of 10% Biodiversity Net Gain.

Local evidence through planning applications shows that more than 10% BNG is achievable in Warwickshire, and the Plan states that they are aiming to link with local priorities, so a greater target should be delivered. A number of other Councils such as Cornwall Council have already got plans through Examination with 20% net gain.